Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approac...

Research

Associated organisational units

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships"

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article

Published

Standard

Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships". / Blois, Keith; Hopkinson, Gillian.
In: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 31, No. 7-8, 2015, p. 765-773.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article

Harvard

Blois, K & Hopkinson, G 2015, 'Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships"', Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 31, no. 7-8, pp. 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.1001587

APA

Blois, K., & Hopkinson, G. (2015). Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships". Journal of Marketing Management, 31(7-8), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.1001587

Vancouver

Blois K, Hopkinson G. Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships". Journal of Marketing Management. 2015;31(7-8):765-773. Epub 2015 Apr 2. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2014.1001587

Author

Blois, Keith ; Hopkinson, Gillian. / Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships". In: Journal of Marketing Management. 2015 ; Vol. 31, No. 7-8. pp. 765-773.

Bibtex

@article{88f8623693d745dab0a5b1d51ddb1b4e,
title = "Rejoinder to Hunt's {"}The bases of power approach to channel relationships{"}",
abstract = "The critique of Blois and Hopkinson (2013) presented by Hunt is examined. Hunt argues that Blois and Hopkinson (2013): make criticisms of the power-base approach in channels of distribution research; that these criticisms can be categorised under five headings; and, that each of these criticism are suspect. This rejoinder examines each of Hunt{\textquoteright}s claims and argues that they are not fully convincing.",
keywords = "power, power-bases, marketing channels, inter-organisational power, social power",
author = "Keith Blois and Gillian Hopkinson",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/0267257X.2014.1001587",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "765--773",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Management",
issn = "0267-257X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "7-8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder to Hunt's "The bases of power approach to channel relationships"

AU - Blois, Keith

AU - Hopkinson, Gillian

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The critique of Blois and Hopkinson (2013) presented by Hunt is examined. Hunt argues that Blois and Hopkinson (2013): make criticisms of the power-base approach in channels of distribution research; that these criticisms can be categorised under five headings; and, that each of these criticism are suspect. This rejoinder examines each of Hunt’s claims and argues that they are not fully convincing.

AB - The critique of Blois and Hopkinson (2013) presented by Hunt is examined. Hunt argues that Blois and Hopkinson (2013): make criticisms of the power-base approach in channels of distribution research; that these criticisms can be categorised under five headings; and, that each of these criticism are suspect. This rejoinder examines each of Hunt’s claims and argues that they are not fully convincing.

KW - power

KW - power-bases

KW - marketing channels

KW - inter-organisational power

KW - social power

U2 - 10.1080/0267257X.2014.1001587

DO - 10.1080/0267257X.2014.1001587

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 765

EP - 773

JO - Journal of Marketing Management

JF - Journal of Marketing Management

SN - 0267-257X

IS - 7-8

ER -