Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Research agendas for the sustainable management...
View graph of relations

Research agendas for the sustainable management of tropical peatland in Malaysia

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

  • Rory Padfield
  • Susan Waldron
  • Simon Drew
  • Effie Papargyropoulou
  • Shashi Kumaran
  • Sue Page
  • Dave Gilvear
  • Alona Armstrong
  • Stephanie Evers
  • Paul Williams
  • Zuriati Zakaria
  • Sing Yun Chin
  • Sune Balle Hansen
  • Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz
  • Mohd Talib Latif
  • Alex Sayok
  • Mun Hou Tham
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>03/2015
<mark>Journal</mark>Environmental Conservation
Issue number1
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)73-83
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date28/02/14
<mark>Original language</mark>English


There is a need for coordinated research for the sustainable management of tropical peatland. Malaysia has 6% of global tropical peat by area and peatlands there are subject to land use change at an unprecedented rate. This paper describes a stakeholder engagement exercise that identified 95 priority research questions for peatland in Malaysia, organized into nine themes. Analysis revealed the need for fundamental scientific research, with strong representation across the themes of environmental change, ecosystem services, and conversion, disturbance and degradation. Considerable uncertainty remains about Malaysia's baseline conditions for peatland, including questions over total remaining area of peatland, water table depths, soil characteristics, hydrological function, biogeochemical processes and ecology. More applied and multidisciplinary studies involving researchers from the social sciences are required. The future sustainability of Malaysian peatland relies on coordinating research agendas via a ‘knowledge hub’ of researchers, strengthening the role of peatlands in land-use planning and development processes, stricter policy enforcement, and bridging the divide between national and provincial governance. Integration of the economic value of peatlands into existing planning regimes is also a stakeholder priority. Finally, current research needs to be better communicated for the benefit of the research community, for improved societal understanding and to inform policy processes.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=ENC The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Environmental Conservation, 42 (1), pp 73-83 2015, © 2015 Cambridge University Press.