Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguis...

Research

Electronic data

  • INJAL response postprint

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sealey, A. (2021), Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’. Int J Appl Linguist., 31: 304-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12369 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12369 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 65.1 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 14/06/23

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/07/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>International Journal of Applied Linguistics
Issue number2
Volume31
Number of pages2
Pages (from-to)304-305
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date14/06/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Bibliographic note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sealey, A. (2021), Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’. Int J Appl Linguist., 31: 304-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12369 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12369 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.