Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sealey, A. (2021), Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’. Int J Appl Linguist., 31: 304-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12369 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12369 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Accepted author manuscript, 65.1 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’
AU - Sealey, A.
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sealey, A. (2021), Response to Viewpoint article ‘‘Applied linguistics, language guidelines and ethical practices: The case for the use of ‘who’ with nonhuman animals’’. Int J Appl Linguist., 31: 304-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12369 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12369 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
PY - 2021/7/31
Y1 - 2021/7/31
U2 - 10.1111/ijal.12369
DO - 10.1111/ijal.12369
M3 - Journal article
VL - 31
SP - 304
EP - 305
JO - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
JF - International Journal of Applied Linguistics
SN - 0802-6106
IS - 2
ER -