Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Revised European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework on palliative sedation
T2 - An international Delphi study
AU - Surges, Séverine M
AU - Brunsch, Holger
AU - Jaspers, Birgit
AU - Apostolidis, Kathi
AU - Cardone, Antonella
AU - Centeno, Carlos
AU - Cherny, Nathan
AU - Csikós, Àgnes
AU - Fainsinger, Robin
AU - Garralda, Eduardo
AU - Ling, Julie
AU - Menten, Johan
AU - Mercadante, Sebastiano
AU - Mosoiu, Daniela
AU - Payne, Sheila
AU - Preston, Nancy
AU - Van den Block, Lieve
AU - Hasselaar, Jeroen
AU - Radbruch, Lukas
PY - 2024/2/29
Y1 - 2024/2/29
N2 - Background: The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) acknowledges palliative sedation as an important, broadly accepted intervention for patients with life-limiting disease experiencing refractory symptoms. The EAPC therefore developed 2009 a framework on palliative sedation. A revision was needed due to new evidence from literature, ongoing debate and criticism of methodology, terminology and applicability. Aim: To provide evidence- and consensus-based guidance on palliative sedation for healthcare professionals involved in end-of-life care, for medical associations and health policy decision-makers. Design: Revision between June 2020 and September 2022 of the 2009 framework using a literature update and a Delphi procedure. Setting: European. Participants: International experts on palliative sedation (identified through literature search and nomination by national palliative care associations) and a European patient organisation. Results: A framework with 42 statements for which high or very high level of consensus was reached. Terminology is defined more precisely with the terms suffering used to encompass distressing physical and psychological symptoms as well as existential suffering and refractory to describe the untreatable (healthcare professionals) and intolerable (patient) nature of the suffering. The principle of proportionality is introduced in the definition of palliative sedation. No specific period of remaining life expectancy is defined, based on the principles of refractoriness of suffering, proportionality and independent decision-making for hydration. Patient autonomy is emphasised. A stepwise pharmacological approach and a guidance on hydration decision-making are provided. Conclusions: This is the first framework on palliative sedation using a strict consensus methodology. It should serve as comprehensive and soundly developed information for healthcare professionals.
AB - Background: The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) acknowledges palliative sedation as an important, broadly accepted intervention for patients with life-limiting disease experiencing refractory symptoms. The EAPC therefore developed 2009 a framework on palliative sedation. A revision was needed due to new evidence from literature, ongoing debate and criticism of methodology, terminology and applicability. Aim: To provide evidence- and consensus-based guidance on palliative sedation for healthcare professionals involved in end-of-life care, for medical associations and health policy decision-makers. Design: Revision between June 2020 and September 2022 of the 2009 framework using a literature update and a Delphi procedure. Setting: European. Participants: International experts on palliative sedation (identified through literature search and nomination by national palliative care associations) and a European patient organisation. Results: A framework with 42 statements for which high or very high level of consensus was reached. Terminology is defined more precisely with the terms suffering used to encompass distressing physical and psychological symptoms as well as existential suffering and refractory to describe the untreatable (healthcare professionals) and intolerable (patient) nature of the suffering. The principle of proportionality is introduced in the definition of palliative sedation. No specific period of remaining life expectancy is defined, based on the principles of refractoriness of suffering, proportionality and independent decision-making for hydration. Patient autonomy is emphasised. A stepwise pharmacological approach and a guidance on hydration decision-making are provided. Conclusions: This is the first framework on palliative sedation using a strict consensus methodology. It should serve as comprehensive and soundly developed information for healthcare professionals.
KW - Deep sedation
KW - Delphi consensus (as the MeSH term consensus is not further defined)
KW - Europe
KW - Palliative sedation (as the MeSH Terms refers only to one type of sedation)
KW - consensus
KW - end-of-life
KW - palliative care
KW - practice guideline
KW - suffering
KW - terminal care
U2 - 10.1177/02692163231220225
DO - 10.1177/02692163231220225
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38297460
VL - 38
SP - 213
EP - 228
JO - Palliative Medicine
JF - Palliative Medicine
SN - 0269-2163
IS - 2
ER -