Rights statement: This chapter has been accepted for publication in Pragmatic markers and peripheries, edited by Daniel Van Olmen and Jolanta Sinkuniene 2021, pages: 251-276, © 2021 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.
Accepted author manuscript, 361 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review
}
TY - CHAP
T1 - Second person parentheticals of unintentional visual perception in British English
AU - Van Olmen, Daniel
N1 - This chapter has been accepted for publication in Pragmatic markers and peripheries, edited by Daniel Van Olmen and Jolanta Sinkuniene 2021, pages: 251-276, © 2021 John Benjamins, the publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use the material in any form.
PY - 2021/10/1
Y1 - 2021/10/1
N2 - This chapter is the first systematic corpus-based study of parenthetical see, you see and do you see in British English. It compares (the relationship between) their clause positions and their uses. The results indicate, inter alia, that see is not simply a shorter form of you see but also that some conflation exists between the three markers. Furthermore, they confirm some of the hypothesized associations of particular functions with the left versus right clause periphery (e.g. see’s attention-getting use in clause-initial position) while challenging others (e.g. you see able to mark clauses in both their left and right periphery as explaining a previous one). The chapter also questions the notion of (inter)subjectivity’s value in the debate about peripheries and functions.
AB - This chapter is the first systematic corpus-based study of parenthetical see, you see and do you see in British English. It compares (the relationship between) their clause positions and their uses. The results indicate, inter alia, that see is not simply a shorter form of you see but also that some conflation exists between the three markers. Furthermore, they confirm some of the hypothesized associations of particular functions with the left versus right clause periphery (e.g. see’s attention-getting use in clause-initial position) while challenging others (e.g. you see able to mark clauses in both their left and right periphery as explaining a previous one). The chapter also questions the notion of (inter)subjectivity’s value in the debate about peripheries and functions.
KW - British English
KW - do you see
KW - left periphery
KW - (inter)subjectivity
KW - parenthetical
KW - pragmatic marker
KW - right periphery
KW - see
KW - you see
M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)
SN - 9789027209306
T3 - Pragmatics and Beyond New Series
SP - 251
EP - 276
BT - Pragmatic markers and peripheries
A2 - Van Olmen, Daniel
A2 - Sinkuniene, Jolanta
PB - John Benjamins
CY - Amsterdam
ER -