Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distributi...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distribution of Social Resources

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distribution of Social Resources. / Fellowes, Matthew.
In: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, Vol. 94, 28.09.2023, p. 55-76.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Fellowes M. Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distribution of Social Resources. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 2023 Sept 28;94:55-76. doi: 10.1017/S1358246123000218

Author

Fellowes, Matthew. / Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distribution of Social Resources. In: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 2023 ; Vol. 94. pp. 55-76.

Bibtex

@article{2ed37745fd9a481facb55bd83520837d,
title = "Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distribution of Social Resources",
abstract = "I suggest that the diagnosis that an individual self-diagnoses with can be influenced by levels of public awareness. Accurate diagnosis requires consideration of multiple diagnoses. Sometimes, different diagnoses can overlap with one another and can only be differentiated in subtle and nuanced ways, but particular diagnoses vary considerably in levels of public awareness. As such, an individual may meet the diagnostic criteria for one diagnosis but self-diagnoses with a different diagnosis because it is better known. I then outline a potential negative consequence of this. Psychiatric diagnoses can grant access to what I call social resources, namely, political advocacy, campaigning for support, participating in scientific research, building diagnostic cultures, and opportunity for social interactions with people who have the same diagnosis. The strength of the social resources for a particular diagnosis can be made stronger when more people have that diagnosis. As such, inaccurate self-diagnosis can result in the social resources for one diagnosis being strengthened whilst not being strengthened in relation to another diagnosis in comparison to accurate diagnosis. This shows how inaccurate self-diagnosis can alter the distribution of social resources. We need to consider whether this is unfair to people who are diagnosed with less well-known conditions.",
author = "Matthew Fellowes",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "28",
doi = "10.1017/S1358246123000218",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "55--76",
journal = "Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement",
issn = "1358-2461",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Diagnosis in Psychiatry and the Distribution of Social Resources

AU - Fellowes, Matthew

PY - 2023/9/28

Y1 - 2023/9/28

N2 - I suggest that the diagnosis that an individual self-diagnoses with can be influenced by levels of public awareness. Accurate diagnosis requires consideration of multiple diagnoses. Sometimes, different diagnoses can overlap with one another and can only be differentiated in subtle and nuanced ways, but particular diagnoses vary considerably in levels of public awareness. As such, an individual may meet the diagnostic criteria for one diagnosis but self-diagnoses with a different diagnosis because it is better known. I then outline a potential negative consequence of this. Psychiatric diagnoses can grant access to what I call social resources, namely, political advocacy, campaigning for support, participating in scientific research, building diagnostic cultures, and opportunity for social interactions with people who have the same diagnosis. The strength of the social resources for a particular diagnosis can be made stronger when more people have that diagnosis. As such, inaccurate self-diagnosis can result in the social resources for one diagnosis being strengthened whilst not being strengthened in relation to another diagnosis in comparison to accurate diagnosis. This shows how inaccurate self-diagnosis can alter the distribution of social resources. We need to consider whether this is unfair to people who are diagnosed with less well-known conditions.

AB - I suggest that the diagnosis that an individual self-diagnoses with can be influenced by levels of public awareness. Accurate diagnosis requires consideration of multiple diagnoses. Sometimes, different diagnoses can overlap with one another and can only be differentiated in subtle and nuanced ways, but particular diagnoses vary considerably in levels of public awareness. As such, an individual may meet the diagnostic criteria for one diagnosis but self-diagnoses with a different diagnosis because it is better known. I then outline a potential negative consequence of this. Psychiatric diagnoses can grant access to what I call social resources, namely, political advocacy, campaigning for support, participating in scientific research, building diagnostic cultures, and opportunity for social interactions with people who have the same diagnosis. The strength of the social resources for a particular diagnosis can be made stronger when more people have that diagnosis. As such, inaccurate self-diagnosis can result in the social resources for one diagnosis being strengthened whilst not being strengthened in relation to another diagnosis in comparison to accurate diagnosis. This shows how inaccurate self-diagnosis can alter the distribution of social resources. We need to consider whether this is unfair to people who are diagnosed with less well-known conditions.

U2 - 10.1017/S1358246123000218

DO - 10.1017/S1358246123000218

M3 - Journal article

VL - 94

SP - 55

EP - 76

JO - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement

JF - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement

SN - 1358-2461

ER -