Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex Differences in Skeletal Muscle Pathology in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction
AU - Wood, Nathanael
AU - Critchlow, Annabel
AU - Cheng, Chew W
AU - Straw, Sam
AU - Hendrickse, Paul W
AU - Pereira, Marcelo G
AU - Wheatcroft, Stephen B
AU - Egginton, Stuart
AU - Witte, Klaus K
AU - Roberts, Lee D
AU - Bowen, T Scott
PY - 2024/10/9
Y1 - 2024/10/9
N2 - BACKGROUND:Women with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have greater symptoms and a lower quality of life compared with men; however, the role of noncardiac mechanisms remains poorly resolved. We hypothesized that differences in skeletal muscle pathology between men and women with HFrEF may explain clinical heterogeneity.METHODS:Muscle biopsies from both men (n=22) and women (n=16) with moderate HFrEF (New York Heart Association classes I–III) and age- and sex-matched controls (n=18 and n=16, respectively) underwent transcriptomics (RNA-sequencing), myofiber structural imaging (histology), and molecular signaling analysis (gene/protein expression), with serum inflammatory profiles analyzed (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Two-way ANOVA was conducted (interaction sex and condition).RESULTS:RNA-sequencing identified 5629 differentially expressed genes between men and women with HFrEF, with upregulated terms for catabolism and downregulated terms for mitochondria in men. mRNA expression confirmed an effect of sex (P<0.05) on proatrophic genes related to ubiquitin proteasome, autophagy, and myostatin systems (higher in all men versus all women), whereas proanabolic IGF1 expression was higher (P<0.05) in women with HFrEF only. Structurally, women compared with men with HFrEF showed a pro-oxidative phenotype, with smaller but higher numbers of type I fibers, alongside higher muscle capillarity (Pinteraction<0.05) and higher type I fiber areal density (Pinteraction<0.05). Differences in gene/protein expression of regulators of muscle phenotype were detected between sexes, including HIF1α, ESR1, VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), and PGC1α expression (P<0.05), and for upstream circulating factors, including VEGF, IL (interleukin)-6, and IL-8 (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Sex differences in muscle pathology in HFrEF exist, with men showing greater abnormalities compared with women related to the transcriptome, fiber phenotype, capillarity, and circulating factors. These preliminary data question whether muscle pathology is a primary mechanism contributing to greater symptoms in women with HFrEF and highlight the need for further investigation.
AB - BACKGROUND:Women with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have greater symptoms and a lower quality of life compared with men; however, the role of noncardiac mechanisms remains poorly resolved. We hypothesized that differences in skeletal muscle pathology between men and women with HFrEF may explain clinical heterogeneity.METHODS:Muscle biopsies from both men (n=22) and women (n=16) with moderate HFrEF (New York Heart Association classes I–III) and age- and sex-matched controls (n=18 and n=16, respectively) underwent transcriptomics (RNA-sequencing), myofiber structural imaging (histology), and molecular signaling analysis (gene/protein expression), with serum inflammatory profiles analyzed (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Two-way ANOVA was conducted (interaction sex and condition).RESULTS:RNA-sequencing identified 5629 differentially expressed genes between men and women with HFrEF, with upregulated terms for catabolism and downregulated terms for mitochondria in men. mRNA expression confirmed an effect of sex (P<0.05) on proatrophic genes related to ubiquitin proteasome, autophagy, and myostatin systems (higher in all men versus all women), whereas proanabolic IGF1 expression was higher (P<0.05) in women with HFrEF only. Structurally, women compared with men with HFrEF showed a pro-oxidative phenotype, with smaller but higher numbers of type I fibers, alongside higher muscle capillarity (Pinteraction<0.05) and higher type I fiber areal density (Pinteraction<0.05). Differences in gene/protein expression of regulators of muscle phenotype were detected between sexes, including HIF1α, ESR1, VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor), and PGC1α expression (P<0.05), and for upstream circulating factors, including VEGF, IL (interleukin)-6, and IL-8 (P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:Sex differences in muscle pathology in HFrEF exist, with men showing greater abnormalities compared with women related to the transcriptome, fiber phenotype, capillarity, and circulating factors. These preliminary data question whether muscle pathology is a primary mechanism contributing to greater symptoms in women with HFrEF and highlight the need for further investigation.
KW - Muscle, Skeletal - physiopathology - metabolism - pathology
KW - exercise
KW - sarcopenia
KW - Transcriptome
KW - Case-Control Studies
KW - women
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Male
KW - Sex Factors
KW - Humans
KW - Stroke Volume - physiology
KW - Heart Failure - physiopathology - genetics - metabolism
KW - Middle Aged
KW - atrophy
KW - capillaries
KW - muscles
KW - Ventricular Function, Left - physiology
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011471
DO - 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011471
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39381880
VL - 17
JO - Circulation. Heart failure
JF - Circulation. Heart failure
SN - 1941-3297
IS - 10
M1 - e011471
ER -