Accepted author manuscript, 830 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart teachers in smart schools in a smart city
T2 - Teachers as adaptive agents of educational technology reforms
AU - Lee, Sejin
AU - Lee, Kyungmee
PY - 2024/7/2
Y1 - 2024/7/2
N2 - This study raises a critical question: ‘what does it mean to be smart teachers in the era of technology?’. To provide a concrete and comprehensive answer, the authors analyse multiple discourses revolving around SMART education, an education technology reform initiative in South Korea. This article critically examines the significance of SMART education as dominant discourse to shed light on the formation of smart teachers. The results show that SMART education is conceptualised as ‘panacea’ that can practically solve all kinds of educational problems, which leaves no choice for teachers but to accept it. The authors also analyse teachers’ perceptions and practices by drawing on interviews conducted in a Korean smart city, where the SMART education was first enacted. It is argued that smart teachers are supposed to be ‘adaptive’ to survive by proving themselves as ‘compatible’. This article concludes that it is necessary to imagine more diverse versions of smart teachers.
AB - This study raises a critical question: ‘what does it mean to be smart teachers in the era of technology?’. To provide a concrete and comprehensive answer, the authors analyse multiple discourses revolving around SMART education, an education technology reform initiative in South Korea. This article critically examines the significance of SMART education as dominant discourse to shed light on the formation of smart teachers. The results show that SMART education is conceptualised as ‘panacea’ that can practically solve all kinds of educational problems, which leaves no choice for teachers but to accept it. The authors also analyse teachers’ perceptions and practices by drawing on interviews conducted in a Korean smart city, where the SMART education was first enacted. It is argued that smart teachers are supposed to be ‘adaptive’ to survive by proving themselves as ‘compatible’. This article concludes that it is necessary to imagine more diverse versions of smart teachers.
KW - Education reform
KW - discourse analysis
KW - ed-tech
KW - subjectivity
U2 - 10.1080/17439884.2023.2207143
DO - 10.1080/17439884.2023.2207143
M3 - Journal article
VL - 49
SP - 456
EP - 477
JO - Learning, Media and Technology
JF - Learning, Media and Technology
SN - 1743-9884
IS - 3
ER -