Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Socially desirable responding
T2 - enhancement and denial in 20 countries
AU - He, J.
AU - Van De Vijver, F. J. R.
AU - Dominguez Espinosa, A.
AU - Abubakar, Amina
AU - Dimitrova, R.
AU - Adams, B. G.
AU - Aydinli, A.
AU - Atitsogbe, K.
AU - Alonso-arbiol, I.
AU - Bobowik, M.
AU - Fischer, R.
AU - Jordanov, V.
AU - Mastrotheodoros, S.
AU - Neto, F.
AU - Ponizovsky, Y. J.
AU - Reb, J.
AU - Sim, S.
AU - Sovet, L.
AU - Stefenel, D.
AU - Suryani, A. O.
AU - Tair, E.
AU - Villieux, A.
PY - 2015/5/25
Y1 - 2015/5/25
N2 - This article investigated the dimensionality, measurement invariance, and cross-cultural variations of social desirability. A total of 3,471 university students from 20 countries completed an adapted version of the Marlowe–Crowne scale. A two-dimensional structure was revealed in the pooled sample, distinguishing enhancement (endorsement of positive self-description) and denial (rejection of negative self-description). The factor structure was supported in most countries; medium-sized item bias was found in two denial items. In a multilevel analysis, we found that (a) there was more cross-cultural variation in denial than enhancement; (b) females tended to score higher on enhancement whereas males tended to score higher on denial; (c) the Human Development Index, an indicator of country socioeconomic development, was the best (negative) predictor of denial; and (d) both enhancement and denial seemed to be associated with country-level values and personality pertinent to “fitting in.” We conclude that social desirability has a positive and a negative impression management dimension that are meaningfully associated with country-level characteristics, and we argue that social desirability is better interpreted as culturally regulated response amplification.
AB - This article investigated the dimensionality, measurement invariance, and cross-cultural variations of social desirability. A total of 3,471 university students from 20 countries completed an adapted version of the Marlowe–Crowne scale. A two-dimensional structure was revealed in the pooled sample, distinguishing enhancement (endorsement of positive self-description) and denial (rejection of negative self-description). The factor structure was supported in most countries; medium-sized item bias was found in two denial items. In a multilevel analysis, we found that (a) there was more cross-cultural variation in denial than enhancement; (b) females tended to score higher on enhancement whereas males tended to score higher on denial; (c) the Human Development Index, an indicator of country socioeconomic development, was the best (negative) predictor of denial; and (d) both enhancement and denial seemed to be associated with country-level values and personality pertinent to “fitting in.” We conclude that social desirability has a positive and a negative impression management dimension that are meaningfully associated with country-level characteristics, and we argue that social desirability is better interpreted as culturally regulated response amplification.
KW - social desirability
KW - cultures
KW - values
KW - personality
KW - multilevel analysis
U2 - 10.1177/1069397114552781
DO - 10.1177/1069397114552781
M3 - Journal article
VL - 49
SP - 227
EP - 249
JO - Cross-Cultural Research
JF - Cross-Cultural Research
SN - 1069-3971
IS - 3
ER -