Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘Something that facilitates our work…rather tha...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’: Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care

Research output: Working paper › Preprint

Published

Standard

‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’: Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care. / Hurley, Ruth; Jury, Francine; van Staa, Tjeerd P. et al.
Research Square, 2022.

Research output: Working paper › Preprint

Harvard

Hurley, R, Jury, F, van Staa, TP, Palin, V & Armitage, C 2022 '‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’: Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care' Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1830801/v3

APA

Hurley, R., Jury, F., van Staa, T. P., Palin, V., & Armitage, C. (2022). ‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’: Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1830801/v3

Vancouver

Hurley R, Jury F, van Staa TP, Palin V, Armitage C. ‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’: Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care. Research Square. 2022 Oct 25. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1830801/v3

Author

Hurley, Ruth ; Jury, Francine ; van Staa, Tjeerd P. et al. / ‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’ : Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care. Research Square, 2022.

Bibtex

@techreport{35fd0e16573c4885b8f8eb6bfe065c46,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance{\textquoteright}: Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care",
abstract = "Background:Polypharmacy and overprescribing pose an enormous challenge to safe healthcare and efficient use of resources. Patient record data could inform safer prescribing and deprescribing, but it is unclear how these complex data should be summarised and displayed to clinicians. The current study examined the perspectives of clinical pharmacists (CPs), a newly expanding workforce of primary care medication specialists, to explore ways that novel analytics could help improve health outcomes for frail and elderly (>65yrs) patients.Methods:The utility of novel analytics interventions were discussed in an exploratory scoping workshop. Health risk data for frail and elderly patients with polypharmacy (modelled from extensive national datasets) were presented to primary care clinical pharmacists (n=14). Verbal and textual comments were thematically analysed using the framework method (exploratory content analysis) combining inductive and deductive approaches.Results:Overarching themes of data use , data reservations and digital tools acceptance factors were identified. Respondents highlighted several uses for polypharmacy analytics interventions, including increased knowledge of clinical effects of drug-drug interactions, the ability to prioritise high-risk patients for reviews and medication to deprescribing (e.g., highlighting cumulative medication risk). Data reservations were linked to existing barriers (such as cognitive overload from existing systems and patient explainability) meaning that CPs{\textquoteright} acceptance of digital analytics tools is heavily contingent on facilitators such as ease of use, clear targeted purpose and the ability to support clinicians{\textquoteright} understanding and confidence in evaluation of analytics for patient care decisions.Conclusion:The workshop helped to identify promising analytics and features for polypharmacy intervention development. Patient record data could help address a concerning deficit in evidence of real-world medication interactions, and help clinicians prioritise medication reviews. Barriers to use of digital tools for novel analytics must be addressed and criteria for acceptable user-focused tools are suggested.",
author = "Ruth Hurley and Francine Jury and {van Staa}, {Tjeerd P.} and Victoria Palin and Christopher Armitage",
year = "2022",
month = oct,
day = "25",
doi = "10.21203/rs.3.rs-1830801/v3",
language = "English",
publisher = "Research Square",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Research Square",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - ‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’

T2 - Clinical pharmacist perspectives on the use of data analytics to support polypharmacy medication reviews in primary care

AU - Hurley, Ruth

AU - Jury, Francine

AU - van Staa, Tjeerd P.

AU - Palin, Victoria

AU - Armitage, Christopher

PY - 2022/10/25

Y1 - 2022/10/25

N2 - Background:Polypharmacy and overprescribing pose an enormous challenge to safe healthcare and efficient use of resources. Patient record data could inform safer prescribing and deprescribing, but it is unclear how these complex data should be summarised and displayed to clinicians. The current study examined the perspectives of clinical pharmacists (CPs), a newly expanding workforce of primary care medication specialists, to explore ways that novel analytics could help improve health outcomes for frail and elderly (>65yrs) patients.Methods:The utility of novel analytics interventions were discussed in an exploratory scoping workshop. Health risk data for frail and elderly patients with polypharmacy (modelled from extensive national datasets) were presented to primary care clinical pharmacists (n=14). Verbal and textual comments were thematically analysed using the framework method (exploratory content analysis) combining inductive and deductive approaches.Results:Overarching themes of data use , data reservations and digital tools acceptance factors were identified. Respondents highlighted several uses for polypharmacy analytics interventions, including increased knowledge of clinical effects of drug-drug interactions, the ability to prioritise high-risk patients for reviews and medication to deprescribing (e.g., highlighting cumulative medication risk). Data reservations were linked to existing barriers (such as cognitive overload from existing systems and patient explainability) meaning that CPs’ acceptance of digital analytics tools is heavily contingent on facilitators such as ease of use, clear targeted purpose and the ability to support clinicians’ understanding and confidence in evaluation of analytics for patient care decisions.Conclusion:The workshop helped to identify promising analytics and features for polypharmacy intervention development. Patient record data could help address a concerning deficit in evidence of real-world medication interactions, and help clinicians prioritise medication reviews. Barriers to use of digital tools for novel analytics must be addressed and criteria for acceptable user-focused tools are suggested.

AB - Background:Polypharmacy and overprescribing pose an enormous challenge to safe healthcare and efficient use of resources. Patient record data could inform safer prescribing and deprescribing, but it is unclear how these complex data should be summarised and displayed to clinicians. The current study examined the perspectives of clinical pharmacists (CPs), a newly expanding workforce of primary care medication specialists, to explore ways that novel analytics could help improve health outcomes for frail and elderly (>65yrs) patients.Methods:The utility of novel analytics interventions were discussed in an exploratory scoping workshop. Health risk data for frail and elderly patients with polypharmacy (modelled from extensive national datasets) were presented to primary care clinical pharmacists (n=14). Verbal and textual comments were thematically analysed using the framework method (exploratory content analysis) combining inductive and deductive approaches.Results:Overarching themes of data use , data reservations and digital tools acceptance factors were identified. Respondents highlighted several uses for polypharmacy analytics interventions, including increased knowledge of clinical effects of drug-drug interactions, the ability to prioritise high-risk patients for reviews and medication to deprescribing (e.g., highlighting cumulative medication risk). Data reservations were linked to existing barriers (such as cognitive overload from existing systems and patient explainability) meaning that CPs’ acceptance of digital analytics tools is heavily contingent on facilitators such as ease of use, clear targeted purpose and the ability to support clinicians’ understanding and confidence in evaluation of analytics for patient care decisions.Conclusion:The workshop helped to identify promising analytics and features for polypharmacy intervention development. Patient record data could help address a concerning deficit in evidence of real-world medication interactions, and help clinicians prioritise medication reviews. Barriers to use of digital tools for novel analytics must be addressed and criteria for acceptable user-focused tools are suggested.

U2 - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1830801/v3

DO - 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1830801/v3

M3 - Preprint

BT - ‘Something that facilitates our work…rather than a hindrance’

PB - Research Square

ER -