Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct
View graph of relations

Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct. / Kolassa, Stephan.
In: Foresight, Vol. 2016, No. 40, 01.01.2016, p. 20-26.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kolassa S. Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct. Foresight. 2016 Jan 1;2016(40):20-26.

Author

Kolassa, Stephan. / Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct. In: Foresight. 2016 ; Vol. 2016, No. 40. pp. 20-26.

Bibtex

@article{ced7fe9eb6e9470298b2176c01853962,
title = "Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct",
abstract = "In the preceding article, Konstantinos Katsikopoulos and Aris Syntetos discussed the trade-offs between forecast bias and forecast variance in choosing a suitable forecasting method. Simple methods, they explain, tend to have large bias but low variance, while complexity reduces bias but at the expense of increasing variance. In short, simple methods might be preferable to complex methods, even if the resulting forecasts are biased. Stephan Kolassa now extends their argument to show that even if we know what the correct model is for the data to be forecast - that is, even if we know the seasonal pattern and other influencing factors for a time series - it may still be better to choose a simpler model, one that excludes one or more of these variables. This is a fascinating takeaway.",
author = "Stephan Kolassa",
year = "2016",
month = jan,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
pages = "20--26",
journal = "Foresight",
issn = "1463-6689",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "40",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sometimes It's Better to be Simple Than Correct

AU - Kolassa, Stephan

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In the preceding article, Konstantinos Katsikopoulos and Aris Syntetos discussed the trade-offs between forecast bias and forecast variance in choosing a suitable forecasting method. Simple methods, they explain, tend to have large bias but low variance, while complexity reduces bias but at the expense of increasing variance. In short, simple methods might be preferable to complex methods, even if the resulting forecasts are biased. Stephan Kolassa now extends their argument to show that even if we know what the correct model is for the data to be forecast - that is, even if we know the seasonal pattern and other influencing factors for a time series - it may still be better to choose a simpler model, one that excludes one or more of these variables. This is a fascinating takeaway.

AB - In the preceding article, Konstantinos Katsikopoulos and Aris Syntetos discussed the trade-offs between forecast bias and forecast variance in choosing a suitable forecasting method. Simple methods, they explain, tend to have large bias but low variance, while complexity reduces bias but at the expense of increasing variance. In short, simple methods might be preferable to complex methods, even if the resulting forecasts are biased. Stephan Kolassa now extends their argument to show that even if we know what the correct model is for the data to be forecast - that is, even if we know the seasonal pattern and other influencing factors for a time series - it may still be better to choose a simpler model, one that excludes one or more of these variables. This is a fascinating takeaway.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2016

SP - 20

EP - 26

JO - Foresight

JF - Foresight

SN - 1463-6689

IS - 40

ER -