Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Studying Lived Experience and Automated Systems: The Case of Universal Credit
AU - Currie, Morgan
AU - Podoletz, Lena
PY - 2023/10/22
Y1 - 2023/10/22
N2 - This paper applies the concept of ‘lived experiences’ to understand people's subjective and everyday encounters with automated systems. We reflect on how qualitative longitudinal research methods are useful for capturing the affective and emotional dimensions of these experiences; these flexible methods also allow for iterative changes that can react to new findings and participant feedback. Using our empirical study on Universal Credit (UC), the UK's largest social security payment, we demonstrate how studying lived experiences via qualitative longitudinal research helps us reflect on both the topic of the research and our position as researchers in relation to study participants. We argue that the lived experience framework is extremely valuable for understanding the consequences of automated decisions for users of these systems and to redress the uneven power dynamics of representing the voices of those sharing these encounters.
AB - This paper applies the concept of ‘lived experiences’ to understand people's subjective and everyday encounters with automated systems. We reflect on how qualitative longitudinal research methods are useful for capturing the affective and emotional dimensions of these experiences; these flexible methods also allow for iterative changes that can react to new findings and participant feedback. Using our empirical study on Universal Credit (UC), the UK's largest social security payment, we demonstrate how studying lived experiences via qualitative longitudinal research helps us reflect on both the topic of the research and our position as researchers in relation to study participants. We argue that the lived experience framework is extremely valuable for understanding the consequences of automated decisions for users of these systems and to redress the uneven power dynamics of representing the voices of those sharing these encounters.
KW - Automated and algorithmic decisions
KW - Digital social security systems
KW - Digitalisation
KW - Lived experience
KW - Qualitative longitudinal research
U2 - 10.1002/pra2.813
DO - 10.1002/pra2.813
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
VL - 60
T3 - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
SP - 547
EP - 552
BT - Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
PB - Association for Information Science and Technology
ER -