Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Supernova 2020wnt: An Atypical Superluminous Su...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Supernova 2020wnt: An Atypical Superluminous Supernova with a Hidden Central Engine

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Samaporn Tinyanont
  • Stan E. Woosley
  • Kirsty Taggart
  • Ryan J. Foley
  • Lin Yan
  • Ragnhild Lunnan
  • Kyle W. Davis
  • Charles D. Kilpatrick
  • Matthew R. Siebert
  • Steve Schulze
  • Chris Ashall
  • Ting-Wan Chen
  • Kishalay De
  • Dillon Z. Dong
  • Christoffer Fremling
  • Alexander Gagliano
  • Saurabh W. Jha
  • David O. Jones
  • Mansi M. Kasliwal
  • Hao-Yu Miao
  • Yen-Chen Pan
  • Daniel A. Perley
  • Vikram Ravi
  • Cesar Rojas-Bravo
  • Itai Sfaradi
  • Jesper Sollerman
  • Vanessa Alarcon
  • Rodrigo Angulo
  • Karoli E. Clever
  • Payton Crawford
  • Cirilla Couch
  • Srujan Dandu
  • Atirath Dhara
  • Jessica Johnson
  • Zhisen Lai
  • Carli Smith
Close
Article number34
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/07/2023
<mark>Journal</mark>The Astrophysical Journal
Issue number1
Volume951
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

We present observations of a peculiar hydrogen- and helium-poor stripped-envelope (SE) supernova (SN) 2020wnt, primarily in the optical and near-infrared (near-IR). Its peak absolute bolometric magnitude of −20.9 mag (L bol, peak = (6.8 ± 0.3) × 10 43 erg s −1) and a rise time of 69 days are reminiscent of hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe (SLSNe I), luminous transients potentially powered by spinning-down magnetars. Before the main peak, there is a brief peak lasting <10 days post explosion, likely caused by interaction with circumstellar medium (CSM) ejected ∼years before the SN explosion. The optical spectra near peak lack a hot continuum and O ii absorptions, which are signs of heating from a central engine; they quantitatively resemble those of radioactivity-powered hydrogen/helium-poor Type Ic SESNe. At ∼1 yr after peak, nebular spectra reveal a blue pseudo-continuum and narrow O i recombination lines associated with magnetar heating. Radio observations rule out strong CSM interactions as the dominant energy source at +266 days post peak. Near-IR observations at +200-300 days reveal carbon monoxide and dust formation, which causes a dramatic optical light-curve dip. Pair-instability explosion models predict slow light curve and spectral features incompatible with observations. SN 2020wnt is best explained as a magnetar-powered core-collapse explosion of a 28 M pre-SN star. The explosion kinetic energy is significantly larger than the magnetar energy at peak, effectively concealing the magnetar-heated inner ejecta until well after peak. SN 2020wnt falls into a continuum between normal SNe Ic and SLSNe I, and demonstrates that optical spectra at peak alone cannot rule out the presence of a central engine.