Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Systematic reviews of the health or health care...

Electronic data

  • JARID_2015_Review_of_Reviews

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Robertson, J., Hatton, C., Baines, S. and Emerson, E. (2015), Systematic Reviews of the Health or Health care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review to Identify Gaps in the Evidence Base. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28: 455–523. doi: 10.1111/jar.12149 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12149/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 876 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Systematic reviews of the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify gaps in the evidence base

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineLiterature reviewpeer-review

Published

Standard

Systematic reviews of the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify gaps in the evidence base. / Robertson, Janet; Hatton, Chris; Baines, Susannah et al.
In: Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, Vol. 28, No. 6, 11.2015, p. 455-523.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineLiterature reviewpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Robertson J, Hatton C, Baines S, Emerson E. Systematic reviews of the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify gaps in the evidence base. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2015 Nov;28(6):455-523. Epub 2015 Mar 31. doi: 10.1111/jar.12149

Author

Bibtex

@article{3de965276c564da6bf76ce5c7bd51d73,
title = "Systematic reviews of the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify gaps in the evidence base",
abstract = "BackgroundSystematic reviews are important in evaluating evidence concerning the health of people with intellectual disabilities. This study conducts a systematic review to identify strengths and gaps in this evidence.MethodElectronic literature searches and email requests identified systematic reviews published in English from 2008 to 2013 on the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities. Reviews were categorized using ICD-10 chapter headings and information extracted regarding methods, number of studies reviewed and findings.ResultsNinety-four reviews were identified: 52 related to ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental or behavioural disorders, 28 to Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with services, and 14 related to other chapters or encompassed multiple chapters. Nine reviews were empty'. No reviews were found for many ICD-10 chapter headings.ConclusionsSystematic reviews are heavily weighted towards mental health, with little coverage of several areas important to the health and mortality of people with intellectual disabilities.",
keywords = "health, intellectual disability, systematic review, OF-THE-LITERATURE, CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR, DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES, LEARNING-DISABILITIES, PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY, DOWN-SYNDROME, PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES, RESEARCH PRIORITIES, ANGER MANAGEMENT, SLEEP PROBLEMS",
author = "Janet Robertson and Chris Hatton and Susannah Baines and Eric Emerson",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Robertson, J., Hatton, C., Baines, S. and Emerson, E. (2015), Systematic Reviews of the Health or Health care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review to Identify Gaps in the Evidence Base. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28: 455–523. doi: 10.1111/jar.12149 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12149/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
year = "2015",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1111/jar.12149",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "455--523",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities",
issn = "1360-2322",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic reviews of the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities

T2 - a systematic review to identify gaps in the evidence base

AU - Robertson, Janet

AU - Hatton, Chris

AU - Baines, Susannah

AU - Emerson, Eric

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Robertson, J., Hatton, C., Baines, S. and Emerson, E. (2015), Systematic Reviews of the Health or Health care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review to Identify Gaps in the Evidence Base. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28: 455–523. doi: 10.1111/jar.12149 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.12149/abstract This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - BackgroundSystematic reviews are important in evaluating evidence concerning the health of people with intellectual disabilities. This study conducts a systematic review to identify strengths and gaps in this evidence.MethodElectronic literature searches and email requests identified systematic reviews published in English from 2008 to 2013 on the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities. Reviews were categorized using ICD-10 chapter headings and information extracted regarding methods, number of studies reviewed and findings.ResultsNinety-four reviews were identified: 52 related to ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental or behavioural disorders, 28 to Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with services, and 14 related to other chapters or encompassed multiple chapters. Nine reviews were empty'. No reviews were found for many ICD-10 chapter headings.ConclusionsSystematic reviews are heavily weighted towards mental health, with little coverage of several areas important to the health and mortality of people with intellectual disabilities.

AB - BackgroundSystematic reviews are important in evaluating evidence concerning the health of people with intellectual disabilities. This study conducts a systematic review to identify strengths and gaps in this evidence.MethodElectronic literature searches and email requests identified systematic reviews published in English from 2008 to 2013 on the health or health care of people with intellectual disabilities. Reviews were categorized using ICD-10 chapter headings and information extracted regarding methods, number of studies reviewed and findings.ResultsNinety-four reviews were identified: 52 related to ICD-10 Chapter V: Mental or behavioural disorders, 28 to Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with services, and 14 related to other chapters or encompassed multiple chapters. Nine reviews were empty'. No reviews were found for many ICD-10 chapter headings.ConclusionsSystematic reviews are heavily weighted towards mental health, with little coverage of several areas important to the health and mortality of people with intellectual disabilities.

KW - health

KW - intellectual disability

KW - systematic review

KW - OF-THE-LITERATURE

KW - CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR

KW - DEVELOPMENTAL-DISABILITIES

KW - LEARNING-DISABILITIES

KW - PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY

KW - DOWN-SYNDROME

KW - PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES

KW - RESEARCH PRIORITIES

KW - ANGER MANAGEMENT

KW - SLEEP PROBLEMS

U2 - 10.1111/jar.12149

DO - 10.1111/jar.12149

M3 - Literature review

VL - 28

SP - 455

EP - 523

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

SN - 1360-2322

IS - 6

ER -