Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Taking Individual Choices Seriously

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work. / Friesl, Martin; Brielmaier, Christoph; Dobusch, Leonhard.
In: Organization Theory, Vol. 4, No. 2, 25.06.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Friesl, M., Brielmaier, C., & Dobusch, L. (2023). Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work. Organization Theory, 4(2). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231183986

Vancouver

Friesl M, Brielmaier C, Dobusch L. Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work. Organization Theory. 2023 Jun 25;4(2). Epub 2023 Jun 25. doi: 10.1177/26317877231183986

Author

Friesl, Martin ; Brielmaier, Christoph ; Dobusch, Leonhard. / Taking Individual Choices Seriously : A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work. In: Organization Theory. 2023 ; Vol. 4, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{8bc8001f42444903b1d1e96d4e17fdb9,
title = "Taking Individual Choices Seriously: A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work",
abstract = "An increasing body of work investigates the participation of a diverse set of actors in strategy making. We argue that extant research tends to gloss over a fundamental condition underpinning such participation: while participation may reflect a hierarchical mandate, insofar as it relates to the actual involvement of employees, it is the result of a process of self-selection. From this perspective, forms of participative strategizing are neither fully the outcome of deliberate top-down choice, nor do they form a random pattern that is subject to the whims of individual employees. Such forms of strategizing are rather, as we argue in this paper, based on an endogenous logic of whether and how an individual self-selects, and in turn involves her/himself in the process, or not. To conceptualize the broader phenomenon of strategy participation, we draw on practice theory to conceptualize how individuals knowingly choose to involve themselves in strategizing events and we develop in turn a process model of self-selection as an ongoing social accomplishment. This model elaborates different patterns of participation in strategy making (stabilizing and shifting trajectories) with variable emergent outcomes. We end the paper by discussing the implications of our theorizing for ongoing research on open and participatory strategizing, and for the body of work on strategy as practice.",
keywords = "self-selection, open strategy, strategy work, strategy-as-practice, strategy process",
author = "Martin Friesl and Christoph Brielmaier and Leonhard Dobusch",
year = "2023",
month = jun,
day = "25",
doi = "10.1177/26317877231183986",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Organization Theory",
issn = "2631-7877",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking Individual Choices Seriously

T2 - A process perspective of self-selection in strategy work

AU - Friesl, Martin

AU - Brielmaier, Christoph

AU - Dobusch, Leonhard

PY - 2023/6/25

Y1 - 2023/6/25

N2 - An increasing body of work investigates the participation of a diverse set of actors in strategy making. We argue that extant research tends to gloss over a fundamental condition underpinning such participation: while participation may reflect a hierarchical mandate, insofar as it relates to the actual involvement of employees, it is the result of a process of self-selection. From this perspective, forms of participative strategizing are neither fully the outcome of deliberate top-down choice, nor do they form a random pattern that is subject to the whims of individual employees. Such forms of strategizing are rather, as we argue in this paper, based on an endogenous logic of whether and how an individual self-selects, and in turn involves her/himself in the process, or not. To conceptualize the broader phenomenon of strategy participation, we draw on practice theory to conceptualize how individuals knowingly choose to involve themselves in strategizing events and we develop in turn a process model of self-selection as an ongoing social accomplishment. This model elaborates different patterns of participation in strategy making (stabilizing and shifting trajectories) with variable emergent outcomes. We end the paper by discussing the implications of our theorizing for ongoing research on open and participatory strategizing, and for the body of work on strategy as practice.

AB - An increasing body of work investigates the participation of a diverse set of actors in strategy making. We argue that extant research tends to gloss over a fundamental condition underpinning such participation: while participation may reflect a hierarchical mandate, insofar as it relates to the actual involvement of employees, it is the result of a process of self-selection. From this perspective, forms of participative strategizing are neither fully the outcome of deliberate top-down choice, nor do they form a random pattern that is subject to the whims of individual employees. Such forms of strategizing are rather, as we argue in this paper, based on an endogenous logic of whether and how an individual self-selects, and in turn involves her/himself in the process, or not. To conceptualize the broader phenomenon of strategy participation, we draw on practice theory to conceptualize how individuals knowingly choose to involve themselves in strategizing events and we develop in turn a process model of self-selection as an ongoing social accomplishment. This model elaborates different patterns of participation in strategy making (stabilizing and shifting trajectories) with variable emergent outcomes. We end the paper by discussing the implications of our theorizing for ongoing research on open and participatory strategizing, and for the body of work on strategy as practice.

KW - self-selection

KW - open strategy

KW - strategy work

KW - strategy-as-practice

KW - strategy process

U2 - 10.1177/26317877231183986

DO - 10.1177/26317877231183986

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

JO - Organization Theory

JF - Organization Theory

SN - 2631-7877

IS - 2

ER -