Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Comment/debate › peer-review
<mark>Journal publication date</mark> | 1/01/2011 |
---|---|
<mark>Journal</mark> | Infancia y Aprendizaje |
Issue number | 3 |
Volume | 34 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Pages (from-to) | 319-322 |
Publication Status | Published |
<mark>Original language</mark> | English |
In this reply we briefly address the following issues: the role of input frequencies; the contrast between an emergentist and an innatist position on the development of tense and agreement marking; the importance of comparing the adult language to that of the child when deciding on the level of grammatical abstraction in the child's system; and, finally, how to reconcile preferential looking results with results from studies using other methods.