Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The effect of tailored reciprocity on informati...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview. / Weiher, Lynn; Winters, Christina; Taylor, Paul et al.
In: Journal of Criminal Psychology, 19.08.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Weiher L, Winters C, Taylor P, Luther K, Watson SJ. The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview. Journal of Criminal Psychology. 2024 Aug 19. Epub 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1108/JCP-01-2024-0004

Author

Bibtex

@article{d4d83af4b3a7478ba87ddd413a6e0d03,
title = "The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview",
abstract = "Purpose: In their study of reciprocity in investigative interviews, Matsumoto and Hwang (2018) found that offering interviewees water prior to the interview enhanced observer-rated rapport and positively affected information provision. This paper aims to examine whether tailoring the item towards an interviewee{\textquoteright}s needs would further enhance information provision. This paper hypothesised that interviewees given a relevant item prior to the interview would disclose more information than interviewees given an irrelevant item or no item. Design/methodology/approach: Participants (n = 85) ate pretzels to induce thirst, engaged in a cheating task with a confederate and were interviewed about their actions after receiving either no item, an irrelevant item to their induced thirst (pen and paper) or a relevant item (water). Findings: This paper found that receiving a relevant item had a significant impact on information provision, with participants who received water providing the most details, and significantly more than participants that received no item. Research limitations/implications: The findings have implications for obtaining information during investigative interviews and demonstrate a need for research on the nuances of social reciprocity in investigative interviewing. Practical implications: The findings have implications for obtaining information during investigative interviews and demonstrate a need for research on the nuances of social reciprocity in investigative interviewing. Originality/value: To the best of the authors{\textquoteright} knowledge, this study is the first to experimentally test the effect of different item types upon information provision in investigative interviews.",
keywords = "Information provision, Investigative interview, Reciprocity, Suspect interviewing",
author = "Lynn Weiher and Christina Winters and Paul Taylor and Kirk Luther and Watson, {Steven James}",
year = "2024",
month = aug,
day = "19",
doi = "10.1108/JCP-01-2024-0004",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Psychology",
issn = "2009-3829",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of tailored reciprocity on information provision in an investigative interview

AU - Weiher, Lynn

AU - Winters, Christina

AU - Taylor, Paul

AU - Luther, Kirk

AU - Watson, Steven James

PY - 2024/8/19

Y1 - 2024/8/19

N2 - Purpose: In their study of reciprocity in investigative interviews, Matsumoto and Hwang (2018) found that offering interviewees water prior to the interview enhanced observer-rated rapport and positively affected information provision. This paper aims to examine whether tailoring the item towards an interviewee’s needs would further enhance information provision. This paper hypothesised that interviewees given a relevant item prior to the interview would disclose more information than interviewees given an irrelevant item or no item. Design/methodology/approach: Participants (n = 85) ate pretzels to induce thirst, engaged in a cheating task with a confederate and were interviewed about their actions after receiving either no item, an irrelevant item to their induced thirst (pen and paper) or a relevant item (water). Findings: This paper found that receiving a relevant item had a significant impact on information provision, with participants who received water providing the most details, and significantly more than participants that received no item. Research limitations/implications: The findings have implications for obtaining information during investigative interviews and demonstrate a need for research on the nuances of social reciprocity in investigative interviewing. Practical implications: The findings have implications for obtaining information during investigative interviews and demonstrate a need for research on the nuances of social reciprocity in investigative interviewing. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to experimentally test the effect of different item types upon information provision in investigative interviews.

AB - Purpose: In their study of reciprocity in investigative interviews, Matsumoto and Hwang (2018) found that offering interviewees water prior to the interview enhanced observer-rated rapport and positively affected information provision. This paper aims to examine whether tailoring the item towards an interviewee’s needs would further enhance information provision. This paper hypothesised that interviewees given a relevant item prior to the interview would disclose more information than interviewees given an irrelevant item or no item. Design/methodology/approach: Participants (n = 85) ate pretzels to induce thirst, engaged in a cheating task with a confederate and were interviewed about their actions after receiving either no item, an irrelevant item to their induced thirst (pen and paper) or a relevant item (water). Findings: This paper found that receiving a relevant item had a significant impact on information provision, with participants who received water providing the most details, and significantly more than participants that received no item. Research limitations/implications: The findings have implications for obtaining information during investigative interviews and demonstrate a need for research on the nuances of social reciprocity in investigative interviewing. Practical implications: The findings have implications for obtaining information during investigative interviews and demonstrate a need for research on the nuances of social reciprocity in investigative interviewing. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to experimentally test the effect of different item types upon information provision in investigative interviews.

KW - Information provision

KW - Investigative interview

KW - Reciprocity

KW - Suspect interviewing

U2 - 10.1108/JCP-01-2024-0004

DO - 10.1108/JCP-01-2024-0004

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85201275870

JO - Journal of Criminal Psychology

JF - Journal of Criminal Psychology

SN - 2009-3829

ER -