Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The impact of paying treatment providers for ou...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot. / Mason, T.; Sutton, M.; Whittaker, W. et al.
In: Addiction, Vol. 110, No. 7, 07.06.2015, p. 1120-1128.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Mason, T, Sutton, M, Whittaker, W, McSweeney, T, Millar, T, Donmall, M, Jones, A & Pierce, M 2015, 'The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot', Addiction, vol. 110, no. 7, pp. 1120-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12920

APA

Mason, T., Sutton, M., Whittaker, W., McSweeney, T., Millar, T., Donmall, M., Jones, A., & Pierce, M. (2015). The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot. Addiction, 110(7), 1120-1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12920

Vancouver

Mason T, Sutton M, Whittaker W, McSweeney T, Millar T, Donmall M et al. The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot. Addiction. 2015 Jun 7;110(7):1120-1128. doi: 10.1111/add.12920

Author

Bibtex

@article{681c2d39c15048e8850a7ba245bc36a7,
title = "The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot",
abstract = "AimsTo estimate the effect on drug misuse treatment completion of a pilot scheme to pay service providers according to rates of recovery.DesignA controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using multi-level random effects logistic regression.SettingDrug misuse treatment providers in all 149 commissioning areas in England in the financial years 2011–12 and 2012–13.ParticipantsService users treated in England in 2011–12 and 2012–13.Intervention and comparatorsLinkage of provider payments to performance indicators in eight pilot commissioning areas in England compared with all 141 non-pilot commissioning areas in England.MeasurementsRecovery was measured by successful completion of treatment (free from drugs of dependence) and engagement with services was measured by rates of declining to continue with treatment.FindingsFollowing the introduction of the pilot scheme, service users treated in pilot areas were 1.3 percentage points [odds ratio (OR) = 0.859; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.788, 0.937] less likely to complete treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas. Service users treated in pilot areas were 0.9 percentage points (OR = 2.934; 95% CI = 2.094, 4.113) more likely to decline to continue with treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas.ConclusionsIn the first year of the pilot {\textquoteleft}Payment by Results for Drugs Recovery{\textquoteright} scheme in England, linking payments to outcomes reduced the probability of completing drug misuse treatment and increased the proportion service users declining to continue with treatment.",
author = "T. Mason and M. Sutton and W. Whittaker and T. McSweeney and T. Millar and M. Donmall and A. Jones and M. Pierce",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1111/add.12920",
language = "English",
volume = "110",
pages = "1120--1128",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of paying treatment providers for outcomes: Difference-in-differences analysis of the 'payment by results for drugs recovery' pilot

AU - Mason, T.

AU - Sutton, M.

AU - Whittaker, W.

AU - McSweeney, T.

AU - Millar, T.

AU - Donmall, M.

AU - Jones, A.

AU - Pierce, M.

PY - 2015/6/7

Y1 - 2015/6/7

N2 - AimsTo estimate the effect on drug misuse treatment completion of a pilot scheme to pay service providers according to rates of recovery.DesignA controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using multi-level random effects logistic regression.SettingDrug misuse treatment providers in all 149 commissioning areas in England in the financial years 2011–12 and 2012–13.ParticipantsService users treated in England in 2011–12 and 2012–13.Intervention and comparatorsLinkage of provider payments to performance indicators in eight pilot commissioning areas in England compared with all 141 non-pilot commissioning areas in England.MeasurementsRecovery was measured by successful completion of treatment (free from drugs of dependence) and engagement with services was measured by rates of declining to continue with treatment.FindingsFollowing the introduction of the pilot scheme, service users treated in pilot areas were 1.3 percentage points [odds ratio (OR) = 0.859; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.788, 0.937] less likely to complete treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas. Service users treated in pilot areas were 0.9 percentage points (OR = 2.934; 95% CI = 2.094, 4.113) more likely to decline to continue with treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas.ConclusionsIn the first year of the pilot ‘Payment by Results for Drugs Recovery’ scheme in England, linking payments to outcomes reduced the probability of completing drug misuse treatment and increased the proportion service users declining to continue with treatment.

AB - AimsTo estimate the effect on drug misuse treatment completion of a pilot scheme to pay service providers according to rates of recovery.DesignA controlled, quasi-experimental (difference-in-differences) observational study using multi-level random effects logistic regression.SettingDrug misuse treatment providers in all 149 commissioning areas in England in the financial years 2011–12 and 2012–13.ParticipantsService users treated in England in 2011–12 and 2012–13.Intervention and comparatorsLinkage of provider payments to performance indicators in eight pilot commissioning areas in England compared with all 141 non-pilot commissioning areas in England.MeasurementsRecovery was measured by successful completion of treatment (free from drugs of dependence) and engagement with services was measured by rates of declining to continue with treatment.FindingsFollowing the introduction of the pilot scheme, service users treated in pilot areas were 1.3 percentage points [odds ratio (OR) = 0.859; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.788, 0.937] less likely to complete treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas. Service users treated in pilot areas were 0.9 percentage points (OR = 2.934; 95% CI = 2.094, 4.113) more likely to decline to continue with treatment compared with those treated in comparison areas.ConclusionsIn the first year of the pilot ‘Payment by Results for Drugs Recovery’ scheme in England, linking payments to outcomes reduced the probability of completing drug misuse treatment and increased the proportion service users declining to continue with treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84931563416&partnerID=MN8TOARS

U2 - 10.1111/add.12920

DO - 10.1111/add.12920

M3 - Journal article

VL - 110

SP - 1120

EP - 1128

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 7

ER -