Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The impact of virtual exchange on TPACK and for...

Electronic data

  • Accepted_Manuscript_CALL

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Assisted Language Learning on 19/03/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09588221.2020.1737546

    Accepted author manuscript, 502 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 19/09/22

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The impact of virtual exchange on TPACK and foreign language competence: reviewing a large-scale implementation across 23 virtual exchanges

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Bart Rienties
  • Tim Lewis
  • Robert O’Dowd
  • Irina Rets
  • Jekaterina Rogaten
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/03/2022
<mark>Journal</mark>Computer Assisted Language Learning
Issue number3
Volume35
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)577-603
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date19/03/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Several studies on Virtual Exchange (VE) have highlighted positive learning experiences, increases in technological pedagogical and content skills (TPACK) and foreign language (FL) competence. However, most VE research to date use qualitative or descriptive case-studies of how VEs have been implemented, and what “might” have worked. In this large-scale quantitative two-study design, we explored how 622 pre-service teachers developed TPACK skills and (perceived) FL competence over time in 23 VEs across 34 institutions in 16 countries. In Study 1, we used a (quasi-) experimental design of 3 VEs in an experimental (n = 151) or control group (n = 77) to explore the impact on TPACK. In Study 2, we used a larger sample of 20 VEs and 394 participants to replicate and contrast the findings from Study 1 in a broader context. In contrast to our expectations, participants in the experimental condition did not have higher TPACK skills growth relative to the control condition in Study 1, which was further confirmed in Study 2. Nonetheless, in Study 2 pre-existing TPACK skills influenced the development of (perceived) FL competence over time, whereby those participants who further strengthened their TPACK skills during the VE were more likely to nurture FL competence. A major lesson from this large-scale implementation is that VEs do not generate TPACK skills and FL competence by osmosis. We encourage CALL researchers to carefully reflect on any positive or negative finding that something has “worked” when there is no comparison or control group included.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Assisted Language Learning on 19/03/2021, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09588221.2020.1737546