Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The importance of retention times in Natural Fl...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions. / Follett, Elizabeth; Beven, Keith; Hankin, Barry et al.
In: Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Vol. 385, 18.04.2024, p. 197-201.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Follett, E, Beven, K, Hankin, B, Mindham, D & Chappell, N 2024, 'The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions', Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, vol. 385, pp. 197-201. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024

APA

Vancouver

Follett E, Beven K, Hankin B, Mindham D, Chappell N. The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences. 2024 Apr 18;385:197-201. doi: 10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024

Author

Follett, Elizabeth ; Beven, Keith ; Hankin, Barry et al. / The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions. In: Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences. 2024 ; Vol. 385. pp. 197-201.

Bibtex

@article{9ca4f4581e1143fb9b31863a9cc41d90,
title = "The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions",
abstract = "The starting point for this study is the simulation study of Metcalfe et al. (2018) which suggested that retention times of the order of 10 h are required for natural flood management storage features to have a maximum effect on large flow peaks. A analysis of the celerity characteristics for some log jams at Tebay Gill, Cumbria (upland UK), suggests that the impacts of storage in slowing the celerities is only of the order of minutes. An analysis of storage-discharge dynamics based on observations at 4 jams reveals that the dynamics of storages can be represented with time constants of between 3 and 213 min, still well short of those required to maximise the effects for larger flood flows. That is not to say that there will not be reduction in flood peaks for smaller events, only that for large events the effects will be limited. A spreadsheet tool for retention times has been developed to help in the design of new schemes that is freely available.",
author = "Elizabeth Follett and Keith Beven and Barry Hankin and David Mindham and Nick Chappell",
year = "2024",
month = apr,
day = "18",
doi = "10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024",
language = "English",
volume = "385",
pages = "197--201",
journal = "Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences",
issn = "2199-899X",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of retention times in Natural Flood Management interventions

AU - Follett, Elizabeth

AU - Beven, Keith

AU - Hankin, Barry

AU - Mindham, David

AU - Chappell, Nick

PY - 2024/4/18

Y1 - 2024/4/18

N2 - The starting point for this study is the simulation study of Metcalfe et al. (2018) which suggested that retention times of the order of 10 h are required for natural flood management storage features to have a maximum effect on large flow peaks. A analysis of the celerity characteristics for some log jams at Tebay Gill, Cumbria (upland UK), suggests that the impacts of storage in slowing the celerities is only of the order of minutes. An analysis of storage-discharge dynamics based on observations at 4 jams reveals that the dynamics of storages can be represented with time constants of between 3 and 213 min, still well short of those required to maximise the effects for larger flood flows. That is not to say that there will not be reduction in flood peaks for smaller events, only that for large events the effects will be limited. A spreadsheet tool for retention times has been developed to help in the design of new schemes that is freely available.

AB - The starting point for this study is the simulation study of Metcalfe et al. (2018) which suggested that retention times of the order of 10 h are required for natural flood management storage features to have a maximum effect on large flow peaks. A analysis of the celerity characteristics for some log jams at Tebay Gill, Cumbria (upland UK), suggests that the impacts of storage in slowing the celerities is only of the order of minutes. An analysis of storage-discharge dynamics based on observations at 4 jams reveals that the dynamics of storages can be represented with time constants of between 3 and 213 min, still well short of those required to maximise the effects for larger flood flows. That is not to say that there will not be reduction in flood peaks for smaller events, only that for large events the effects will be limited. A spreadsheet tool for retention times has been developed to help in the design of new schemes that is freely available.

U2 - 10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024

DO - 10.5194/piahs-385-197-2024

M3 - Journal article

VL - 385

SP - 197

EP - 201

JO - Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences

SN - 2199-899X

ER -