Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinat...
View graph of relations

The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinatory experiences: a literature review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinatory experiences: a literature review and meta-analysis. / Varese, Filippo; Bentall, Richard P.
In: Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 31, No. 5, 07.2011, p. 850-864.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Varese F, Bentall RP. The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinatory experiences: a literature review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2011 Jul;31(5):850-864. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.001

Author

Varese, Filippo ; Bentall, Richard P. / The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinatory experiences : a literature review and meta-analysis. In: Clinical Psychology Review. 2011 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 850-864.

Bibtex

@article{2d9e9f3ab634485597d7262a78c841fb,
title = "The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinatory experiences: a literature review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "An influential model of hallucinations proposed by Morrison et al. (1995. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 265-280) assumes that dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs lead to the misattribution of intrusive thoughts to external sources, therefore generating hallucinatory experiences. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, a series of meta-analyses was carried out to summarize the empirical findings on the association between hallucination-proneness and different metacognitive beliefs. The results of this research synthesis found little support for the existence of specific associations between hallucinations and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs. While metacognitive beliefs are robustly associated with hallucination-proneness in non-clinical studies, they were only moderately associated with hallucinations in clinical samples. Additional analyses revealed that, after controlling for the effect of comorbid symptoms, hallucination-proneness was only weakly associated with metacognitive beliefs, suggesting that the large associations observed in previous research might stem from the failure to consider the covariation between different symptoms. These findings have important implications in relation to the role of metacognitive factors in psychopathological symptoms, as well as for the implementation of metacognitive-focused cognitive behavioural techniques for the treatment of psychosis.",
keywords = "Cognition, Culture, Hallucinations, Humans",
author = "Filippo Varese and Bentall, {Richard P.}",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "850--864",
journal = "Clinical Psychology Review",
issn = "0272-7358",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The metacognitive beliefs account of hallucinatory experiences

T2 - a literature review and meta-analysis

AU - Varese, Filippo

AU - Bentall, Richard P.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - An influential model of hallucinations proposed by Morrison et al. (1995. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 265-280) assumes that dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs lead to the misattribution of intrusive thoughts to external sources, therefore generating hallucinatory experiences. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, a series of meta-analyses was carried out to summarize the empirical findings on the association between hallucination-proneness and different metacognitive beliefs. The results of this research synthesis found little support for the existence of specific associations between hallucinations and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs. While metacognitive beliefs are robustly associated with hallucination-proneness in non-clinical studies, they were only moderately associated with hallucinations in clinical samples. Additional analyses revealed that, after controlling for the effect of comorbid symptoms, hallucination-proneness was only weakly associated with metacognitive beliefs, suggesting that the large associations observed in previous research might stem from the failure to consider the covariation between different symptoms. These findings have important implications in relation to the role of metacognitive factors in psychopathological symptoms, as well as for the implementation of metacognitive-focused cognitive behavioural techniques for the treatment of psychosis.

AB - An influential model of hallucinations proposed by Morrison et al. (1995. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 265-280) assumes that dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs lead to the misattribution of intrusive thoughts to external sources, therefore generating hallucinatory experiences. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, a series of meta-analyses was carried out to summarize the empirical findings on the association between hallucination-proneness and different metacognitive beliefs. The results of this research synthesis found little support for the existence of specific associations between hallucinations and dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs. While metacognitive beliefs are robustly associated with hallucination-proneness in non-clinical studies, they were only moderately associated with hallucinations in clinical samples. Additional analyses revealed that, after controlling for the effect of comorbid symptoms, hallucination-proneness was only weakly associated with metacognitive beliefs, suggesting that the large associations observed in previous research might stem from the failure to consider the covariation between different symptoms. These findings have important implications in relation to the role of metacognitive factors in psychopathological symptoms, as well as for the implementation of metacognitive-focused cognitive behavioural techniques for the treatment of psychosis.

KW - Cognition

KW - Culture

KW - Hallucinations

KW - Humans

U2 - 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.001

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21549663

VL - 31

SP - 850

EP - 864

JO - Clinical Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Psychology Review

SN - 0272-7358

IS - 5

ER -