Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Production of Hegemonic Policy Discourses: ...
View graph of relations

The Production of Hegemonic Policy Discourses: 'Competitiveness' as a Knowledge Brand and its (Re-)Contextualization

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Production of Hegemonic Policy Discourses: 'Competitiveness' as a Knowledge Brand and its (Re-)Contextualization. / Sum, Ngai-Ling.

In: Critical Policy Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2009, p. 184-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{d4cc5c88e3f04d6eba3906559672f7f7,
title = "The Production of Hegemonic Policy Discourses: 'Competitiveness' as a Knowledge Brand and its (Re-)Contextualization",
abstract = "{\textquoteleft}Competitiveness{\textquoteright} has become a transnational policy buzzword in a globalized world and this invites us to examine critically {\textquoteleft}competitiveness{\textquoteright} discourses and their manifestations in the policy-consultancy circuit. This article adopts a {\textquoteleft}cultural political economy{\textquoteright} (CPE) approach to the rise to hegemonic {\textquoteleft}knowledge brand{\textquoteright} status since the mid-1990s of the influential account of Michael E. Porter and his Harvard Business School associates. This account of competitiveness has since been recontextualized from the national to the urban, regional and global scales. The article interweaves theoretical and empirical arguments in five steps. First, it outlines the bases of CPE as a discursive as well as material account of the remaking and reproduction of social relations. Second, it presents three stages in the development of {\textquoteleft}competitiveness{\textquoteright} discourses from theoretical paradigm to knowledge brand. Third, it explores how this knowledge brand has been recontextualized through knowledge apparatuses, such as indices and metaphors, as well as through related technologies of power at the global level and the regional-national scale of East Asia. Fourth, and conversely, it shows how this hegemonic logic of competitiveness is being challenged and negotiated in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Fifth, it offers some concluding comments on knowledge brands and on how CPE can contribute to a critical understanding of policy-making.",
keywords = "hegemony , competitiveness , knowledge brand , technologies of power , Michael Porter",
author = "Ngai-Ling Sum",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/19460170903385668",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "184--203",
journal = "Critical Policy Studies",
issn = "1946-0171",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Production of Hegemonic Policy Discourses: 'Competitiveness' as a Knowledge Brand and its (Re-)Contextualization

AU - Sum, Ngai-Ling

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - ‘Competitiveness’ has become a transnational policy buzzword in a globalized world and this invites us to examine critically ‘competitiveness’ discourses and their manifestations in the policy-consultancy circuit. This article adopts a ‘cultural political economy’ (CPE) approach to the rise to hegemonic ‘knowledge brand’ status since the mid-1990s of the influential account of Michael E. Porter and his Harvard Business School associates. This account of competitiveness has since been recontextualized from the national to the urban, regional and global scales. The article interweaves theoretical and empirical arguments in five steps. First, it outlines the bases of CPE as a discursive as well as material account of the remaking and reproduction of social relations. Second, it presents three stages in the development of ‘competitiveness’ discourses from theoretical paradigm to knowledge brand. Third, it explores how this knowledge brand has been recontextualized through knowledge apparatuses, such as indices and metaphors, as well as through related technologies of power at the global level and the regional-national scale of East Asia. Fourth, and conversely, it shows how this hegemonic logic of competitiveness is being challenged and negotiated in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Fifth, it offers some concluding comments on knowledge brands and on how CPE can contribute to a critical understanding of policy-making.

AB - ‘Competitiveness’ has become a transnational policy buzzword in a globalized world and this invites us to examine critically ‘competitiveness’ discourses and their manifestations in the policy-consultancy circuit. This article adopts a ‘cultural political economy’ (CPE) approach to the rise to hegemonic ‘knowledge brand’ status since the mid-1990s of the influential account of Michael E. Porter and his Harvard Business School associates. This account of competitiveness has since been recontextualized from the national to the urban, regional and global scales. The article interweaves theoretical and empirical arguments in five steps. First, it outlines the bases of CPE as a discursive as well as material account of the remaking and reproduction of social relations. Second, it presents three stages in the development of ‘competitiveness’ discourses from theoretical paradigm to knowledge brand. Third, it explores how this knowledge brand has been recontextualized through knowledge apparatuses, such as indices and metaphors, as well as through related technologies of power at the global level and the regional-national scale of East Asia. Fourth, and conversely, it shows how this hegemonic logic of competitiveness is being challenged and negotiated in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. Fifth, it offers some concluding comments on knowledge brands and on how CPE can contribute to a critical understanding of policy-making.

KW - hegemony

KW - competitiveness

KW - knowledge brand

KW - technologies of power

KW - Michael Porter

U2 - 10.1080/19460170903385668

DO - 10.1080/19460170903385668

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 184

EP - 203

JO - Critical Policy Studies

JF - Critical Policy Studies

SN - 1946-0171

IS - 2

ER -