Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The quality and costs of residential services f...
View graph of relations

The quality and costs of residential services for adults with multiple disabilities : a comparative evaluation.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The quality and costs of residential services for adults with multiple disabilities : a comparative evaluation. / Hatton, Chris; Emerson, Eric; Robertson, Janet M. et al.
In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 16, No. 6, 11.1995, p. 439-460.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hatton C, Emerson E, Robertson JM, Henderson D, Cooper J. The quality and costs of residential services for adults with multiple disabilities : a comparative evaluation. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 1995 Nov;16(6):439-460. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00029-1

Author

Bibtex

@article{d16dadc375454653b60c6608a5eed53a,
title = "The quality and costs of residential services for adults with multiple disabilities : a comparative evaluation.",
abstract = "The costs and quality of four different service models for 40 adults with multiple disabilities were compared. The four service models were: specialised institution-based units; a specialised, campus-style, further education service; specialised community-based group homes; and “ordinary” community-based group homes. Some information was also available from five adults with multiple disabilities living in traditional institutions for people with mental retardation. On almost all measures of service outcome the specialised group-home model was the “preferred” service model, although this model was not associated with particularly high service costs. There was, however, considerable variation in quality within, as well as between, service models, with some residents in all service models experiencing levels of support and engagement similar to those found in traditional institutions. The results of the study are discussed in relation to notions of typical practice and normative standards. The implications of the findings are discussed.",
author = "Chris Hatton and Eric Emerson and Robertson, {Janet M.} and Dawn Henderson and Janet Cooper",
year = "1995",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/0891-4222(95)00029-1",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "439--460",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The quality and costs of residential services for adults with multiple disabilities : a comparative evaluation.

AU - Hatton, Chris

AU - Emerson, Eric

AU - Robertson, Janet M.

AU - Henderson, Dawn

AU - Cooper, Janet

PY - 1995/11

Y1 - 1995/11

N2 - The costs and quality of four different service models for 40 adults with multiple disabilities were compared. The four service models were: specialised institution-based units; a specialised, campus-style, further education service; specialised community-based group homes; and “ordinary” community-based group homes. Some information was also available from five adults with multiple disabilities living in traditional institutions for people with mental retardation. On almost all measures of service outcome the specialised group-home model was the “preferred” service model, although this model was not associated with particularly high service costs. There was, however, considerable variation in quality within, as well as between, service models, with some residents in all service models experiencing levels of support and engagement similar to those found in traditional institutions. The results of the study are discussed in relation to notions of typical practice and normative standards. The implications of the findings are discussed.

AB - The costs and quality of four different service models for 40 adults with multiple disabilities were compared. The four service models were: specialised institution-based units; a specialised, campus-style, further education service; specialised community-based group homes; and “ordinary” community-based group homes. Some information was also available from five adults with multiple disabilities living in traditional institutions for people with mental retardation. On almost all measures of service outcome the specialised group-home model was the “preferred” service model, although this model was not associated with particularly high service costs. There was, however, considerable variation in quality within, as well as between, service models, with some residents in all service models experiencing levels of support and engagement similar to those found in traditional institutions. The results of the study are discussed in relation to notions of typical practice and normative standards. The implications of the findings are discussed.

U2 - 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00029-1

DO - 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00029-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 439

EP - 460

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

IS - 6

ER -