Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Em...

Electronic data

  • The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment on 13/11/2017, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223891.2017.1389745

    Accepted author manuscript, 617 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy: A comparison between paper-and-pencil versus online formats in Italian samples

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>4/03/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Personality Assessment
Issue number2
Volume101
Number of pages12
Pages (from-to)159-170
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date13/11/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

The most recent conceptualizations of empathy recognize affective empathy as distinct from cognitive empathy. Consequently, instruments that assess these 2 types of empathy have been developed. Among them, the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a particularly promising, relatively new, self-report measure consisting of 31 items. To examine the cross-cultural adaptability of the QCAE, we investigated the psychometric properties of an Italian version in 2 samples and with 2 different formats of administration. Study 1 (n = 407) used archival data collected via paper and pencil; Study 2 (n = 285) used newly collected data, obtained with an online format. In these studies, in addition to the QCAE, 6 other instruments measuring empathy-related constructs (i.e., interpersonal competence, well-being, personality traits, emotion regulation, alexithymia, and emotion recognition) were administered, too. Data analysis focused on factor structure, internal consistency, and convergent validity. The findings of both studies provide support for the cross-cultural applicability of the QCAE, and reveal interesting associations between empathy and the other constructs under examination.