Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceive...

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceived Fluency: A Meta-Analysis of Correlational Studies

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceived Fluency: A Meta-Analysis of Correlational Studies. / Suzuki, Shungo; Kormos, Judit; Uchihara, Takumi.
In: Modern Language Journal, Vol. 105, No. 2, 30.06.2021, p. 435-463.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Suzuki S, Kormos J, Uchihara T. The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceived Fluency: A Meta-Analysis of Correlational Studies. Modern Language Journal. 2021 Jun 30;105(2):435-463. Epub 2021 May 4. doi: 10.1111/modl.12706

Author

Suzuki, Shungo ; Kormos, Judit ; Uchihara, Takumi. / The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceived Fluency : A Meta-Analysis of Correlational Studies. In: Modern Language Journal. 2021 ; Vol. 105, No. 2. pp. 435-463.

Bibtex

@article{64806a4930f6458b973cf2db25dde2b0,
title = "The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceived Fluency: A Meta-Analysis of Correlational Studies",
abstract = "Listener‐based judgements of fluency play an important role in second language (L2) communication contexts and in L2 assessment. Accordingly, our meta‐analysis examined the relationship between different aspects of utterance fluency and listener‐based judgements of perceived fluency by analyzing primary studies reporting correlation coefficients between objective measures of temporal features and subjective ratings of fluency. We analyzed 263 effect sizes from 22 studies (N = 335–746) to calculate the mean effect sizes of the links between utterance and perceived fluency. We also investigated the moderator effects of 11 methodological factors—such as speech stimuli, listeners{\textquoteright} background, rating procedure, and computation of utterance fluency measures—on the relationship between utterance and perceived fluency. Perceived fluency was strongly associated with speed and pause frequency, r = |.59–.62|; moderately with pause duration, r = |.46|; and weakly with repair fluency, r = |.20|; while composite measures showed the strongest effect sizes, r = |.72–.76|. Moderator analyses revealed that the utterance–perceived fluency link is influenced by methodological variables related to how speech samples are prepared for listeners{\textquoteright} judgements and how listeners{\textquoteright} attention is directed in evaluations of fluency. These findings suggest future directions for L2 fluency research and implications for language assessment.",
keywords = "perceived fluency, utterance fluency, meta‐analysis, speech perception, second language speaking",
author = "Shungo Suzuki and Judit Kormos and Takumi Uchihara",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/modl.12706",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "435--463",
journal = "Modern Language Journal",
issn = "1540-4781",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Relationship Between Utterance and Perceived Fluency

T2 - A Meta-Analysis of Correlational Studies

AU - Suzuki, Shungo

AU - Kormos, Judit

AU - Uchihara, Takumi

PY - 2021/6/30

Y1 - 2021/6/30

N2 - Listener‐based judgements of fluency play an important role in second language (L2) communication contexts and in L2 assessment. Accordingly, our meta‐analysis examined the relationship between different aspects of utterance fluency and listener‐based judgements of perceived fluency by analyzing primary studies reporting correlation coefficients between objective measures of temporal features and subjective ratings of fluency. We analyzed 263 effect sizes from 22 studies (N = 335–746) to calculate the mean effect sizes of the links between utterance and perceived fluency. We also investigated the moderator effects of 11 methodological factors—such as speech stimuli, listeners’ background, rating procedure, and computation of utterance fluency measures—on the relationship between utterance and perceived fluency. Perceived fluency was strongly associated with speed and pause frequency, r = |.59–.62|; moderately with pause duration, r = |.46|; and weakly with repair fluency, r = |.20|; while composite measures showed the strongest effect sizes, r = |.72–.76|. Moderator analyses revealed that the utterance–perceived fluency link is influenced by methodological variables related to how speech samples are prepared for listeners’ judgements and how listeners’ attention is directed in evaluations of fluency. These findings suggest future directions for L2 fluency research and implications for language assessment.

AB - Listener‐based judgements of fluency play an important role in second language (L2) communication contexts and in L2 assessment. Accordingly, our meta‐analysis examined the relationship between different aspects of utterance fluency and listener‐based judgements of perceived fluency by analyzing primary studies reporting correlation coefficients between objective measures of temporal features and subjective ratings of fluency. We analyzed 263 effect sizes from 22 studies (N = 335–746) to calculate the mean effect sizes of the links between utterance and perceived fluency. We also investigated the moderator effects of 11 methodological factors—such as speech stimuli, listeners’ background, rating procedure, and computation of utterance fluency measures—on the relationship between utterance and perceived fluency. Perceived fluency was strongly associated with speed and pause frequency, r = |.59–.62|; moderately with pause duration, r = |.46|; and weakly with repair fluency, r = |.20|; while composite measures showed the strongest effect sizes, r = |.72–.76|. Moderator analyses revealed that the utterance–perceived fluency link is influenced by methodological variables related to how speech samples are prepared for listeners’ judgements and how listeners’ attention is directed in evaluations of fluency. These findings suggest future directions for L2 fluency research and implications for language assessment.

KW - perceived fluency

KW - utterance fluency

KW - meta‐analysis

KW - speech perception

KW - second language speaking

U2 - 10.1111/modl.12706

DO - 10.1111/modl.12706

M3 - Journal article

VL - 105

SP - 435

EP - 463

JO - Modern Language Journal

JF - Modern Language Journal

SN - 1540-4781

IS - 2

ER -