Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The role of prosocial and proactive safety beha...

Electronic data

  • Curcuruto et al. 2015 Tables

    Submitted manuscript, 23.9 KB, Word document

  • Curcuruto_et_al._2015

    Rights statement: 18 month embargo This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Safety Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Safety Science, 80, 2015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.032

    Accepted author manuscript, 125 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

  • Email acceptance Curcuruto et al.

    151 KB, Word document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance. / Curcuruto, Matteo; Conchie, Stacey M.; Mariani, M.G.; Violante, F. S.

In: Safety Science, Vol. 80, 12.2015, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Curcuruto, Matteo ; Conchie, Stacey M. ; Mariani, M.G. ; Violante, F. S. / The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance. In: Safety Science. 2015 ; Vol. 80. pp. 317-323.

Bibtex

@article{c8a38937159c49a8afff5e57f3efd9e7,
title = "The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance",
abstract = "Employees{\textquoteright} engagement in safety is assumed to be a significant contributor to safety performance within the chemical industry. The current study tested this assumption by examining the role of prosocial safety behaviors (e.g., helping others) and proactive safety behaviors (e.g., seeking change) in predicting four safety performance outcomes: micro-accidents, property damage (accidents without injury), near-miss events, and lost-time injuries. Two-wave data collected from 511 employees located in 2 Italian chemical plants revealed that prosocial safety behaviors predicted micro-accidents and property damage, and proactive safety behaviors predicted near-miss events and lost-time injuries. These results suggest that benefits can be gained from distinguishing between prosocial and proactive safety behaviors when seeking to improve safety performance. Organizations may reduce the rate of minor injuries and property damage by increasing helping among employees. However, this approach will be less effective in reducing more serious accidents or increasing near-miss event reporting. More effective in these cases is creating environments in which employees feel able to raise their suggestions and concerns about safety.",
keywords = "Chemical, Proactive safety behavior, Safety participation",
author = "Matteo Curcuruto and Conchie, {Stacey M.} and M.G. Mariani and Violante, {F. S.}",
note = " 18 month embargo This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Safety Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Safety Science, 80, 2015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.032",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.032",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "Safety Science",
issn = "0925-7535",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of prosocial and proactive safety behaviors in predicting safety performance

AU - Curcuruto, Matteo

AU - Conchie, Stacey M.

AU - Mariani, M.G.

AU - Violante, F. S.

N1 - 18 month embargo This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Safety Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Safety Science, 80, 2015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.032

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Employees’ engagement in safety is assumed to be a significant contributor to safety performance within the chemical industry. The current study tested this assumption by examining the role of prosocial safety behaviors (e.g., helping others) and proactive safety behaviors (e.g., seeking change) in predicting four safety performance outcomes: micro-accidents, property damage (accidents without injury), near-miss events, and lost-time injuries. Two-wave data collected from 511 employees located in 2 Italian chemical plants revealed that prosocial safety behaviors predicted micro-accidents and property damage, and proactive safety behaviors predicted near-miss events and lost-time injuries. These results suggest that benefits can be gained from distinguishing between prosocial and proactive safety behaviors when seeking to improve safety performance. Organizations may reduce the rate of minor injuries and property damage by increasing helping among employees. However, this approach will be less effective in reducing more serious accidents or increasing near-miss event reporting. More effective in these cases is creating environments in which employees feel able to raise their suggestions and concerns about safety.

AB - Employees’ engagement in safety is assumed to be a significant contributor to safety performance within the chemical industry. The current study tested this assumption by examining the role of prosocial safety behaviors (e.g., helping others) and proactive safety behaviors (e.g., seeking change) in predicting four safety performance outcomes: micro-accidents, property damage (accidents without injury), near-miss events, and lost-time injuries. Two-wave data collected from 511 employees located in 2 Italian chemical plants revealed that prosocial safety behaviors predicted micro-accidents and property damage, and proactive safety behaviors predicted near-miss events and lost-time injuries. These results suggest that benefits can be gained from distinguishing between prosocial and proactive safety behaviors when seeking to improve safety performance. Organizations may reduce the rate of minor injuries and property damage by increasing helping among employees. However, this approach will be less effective in reducing more serious accidents or increasing near-miss event reporting. More effective in these cases is creating environments in which employees feel able to raise their suggestions and concerns about safety.

KW - Chemical

KW - Proactive safety behavior

KW - Safety participation

U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.032

DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.032

M3 - Journal article

VL - 80

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - Safety Science

JF - Safety Science

SN - 0925-7535

ER -