Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The self-rated health of British adults with in...

Electronic data

  • RIDD_2014_Self_rated_health

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Research in Developmental Disabilities. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3, 2014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005

    235 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The self-rated health of British adults with intellectual disability

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

The self-rated health of British adults with intellectual disability. / Emerson, Eric; Robertson, Janet; Baines, Susannah et al.
In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 35, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 591-596.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Emerson E, Robertson J, Baines S, Hatton C. The self-rated health of British adults with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2014 Mar;35(3):591-596. Epub 2014 Jan 27. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005

Author

Emerson, Eric ; Robertson, Janet ; Baines, Susannah et al. / The self-rated health of British adults with intellectual disability. In: Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 591-596.

Bibtex

@article{c9facddd28a64917b6bbe31157ac7e9e,
title = "The self-rated health of British adults with intellectual disability",
abstract = "People with intellectual disability have significantly higher age-adjusted rates of mortality and morbidity than their non-disabled peers. While self-rated health status is commonly used as an indicator of the health status of populations of interest, few studies have explored the self-rated health of adults with intellectual disability. We undertook secondary analysis of de-identified cross-sectional data from the first waves of two contemporary UK surveys: the Life Opportunities Survey (n=37,513) and Understanding Society (n=50,976). In the Life Opportunities Survey we identified 316 participants age 16-49 (1.7% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. In Understanding Society we identified 415 participants age 16-49 (1.5% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. Participants with intellectual disability were significantly more likely to report having fair or worse health than their peers (Life Opportunities Survey OR=8.86 (6.54-12.01), p",
keywords = "Self-rated health, Health , Health disparities , Socio-economic disadvantage , Discrimination",
author = "Eric Emerson and Janet Robertson and Susannah Baines and Chris Hatton",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Research in Developmental Disabilities. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3, 2014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "591--596",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The self-rated health of British adults with intellectual disability

AU - Emerson, Eric

AU - Robertson, Janet

AU - Baines, Susannah

AU - Hatton, Chris

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Research in Developmental Disabilities. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 3, 2014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - People with intellectual disability have significantly higher age-adjusted rates of mortality and morbidity than their non-disabled peers. While self-rated health status is commonly used as an indicator of the health status of populations of interest, few studies have explored the self-rated health of adults with intellectual disability. We undertook secondary analysis of de-identified cross-sectional data from the first waves of two contemporary UK surveys: the Life Opportunities Survey (n=37,513) and Understanding Society (n=50,976). In the Life Opportunities Survey we identified 316 participants age 16-49 (1.7% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. In Understanding Society we identified 415 participants age 16-49 (1.5% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. Participants with intellectual disability were significantly more likely to report having fair or worse health than their peers (Life Opportunities Survey OR=8.86 (6.54-12.01), p

AB - People with intellectual disability have significantly higher age-adjusted rates of mortality and morbidity than their non-disabled peers. While self-rated health status is commonly used as an indicator of the health status of populations of interest, few studies have explored the self-rated health of adults with intellectual disability. We undertook secondary analysis of de-identified cross-sectional data from the first waves of two contemporary UK surveys: the Life Opportunities Survey (n=37,513) and Understanding Society (n=50,976). In the Life Opportunities Survey we identified 316 participants age 16-49 (1.7% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. In Understanding Society we identified 415 participants age 16-49 (1.5% of the age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability. Participants with intellectual disability were significantly more likely to report having fair or worse health than their peers (Life Opportunities Survey OR=8.86 (6.54-12.01), p

KW - Self-rated health

KW - Health

KW - Health disparities

KW - Socio-economic disadvantage

KW - Discrimination

U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.005

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24480610

VL - 35

SP - 591

EP - 596

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

IS - 3

ER -