Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > The transition from abortion to miscarriage to ...

Electronic data

  • Editor_copy_MH_miscarriage_or_abortion (1)

    Rights statement: This article has been accepted for publication in Medical Humanities following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at 10.1136/medhum-2021-012373

    Accepted author manuscript, 284 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

The transition from abortion to miscarriage to describe early pregnancy loss in British Medical Journals: a prescribed or natural lexical change?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

The transition from abortion to miscarriage to describe early pregnancy loss in British Medical Journals : a prescribed or natural lexical change? / Malory, Beth.

In: Medical Humanities, 30.03.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{a96cb4702c5746bd9d5f2485c57c8c05,
title = "The transition from abortion to miscarriage to describe early pregnancy loss in British Medical Journals: a prescribed or natural lexical change?",
abstract = "In British medical research, the transition from abortion to miscarriage, to describe early pregnancy loss, occurred in the late twentieth century. A 1985 letter to The Lancet by a group of eminent obstetricians was long considered unilaterally to have prompted this shift. More recently, however, this conclusion was challenged, and it was suggested instead that the transition constituted natural language change, as medical professionals responded to their changing social and professional milieu. This paper, however, uses a pioneering statistical modelling technique to demonstrate decisively that the 1985 Lancet letter was indeed pivotal in promoting miscarriage as an acceptable variant for use in medical journals. The abrupt nature of the vocabulary shift in question is made clear through the pioneering application of the statistical modelling technique change point analysis. This methodological innovation demonstrates clearly the decisive impact of the 1985 letter, while also showcasing the remarkable suitability of change point analysis to the study of such sudden linguistic changes. With an increasing emphasis on patient-centred models of care, it is likely that further prescriptive interventions relating to medical language will be made in coming years. Indeed, beyond the medical profession, there are already increasing calls for further reform to the language of pregnancy loss. To understand how such language reforms might successfully be enacted, and to ensure that linguistic prescriptivism is employed only where change is appropriate, proportionate, and evidence-based, it is necessary to understand fully this historical precedent. Against the backdrop of recent 'lay' demands for reforms, this paper affirms the decisive impact of the 1985 intervention, and considers the ramifications of this finding for the study of linguistic prescriptivism and future medical language reform. ",
keywords = "gynaecology, medical humanities, obstetrics, linguistics, pregnancy",
author = "Beth Malory",
note = "This article has been accepted for publication in Medical Humanities following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at 10.1136/medhum-2021-012373",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1136/medhum-2021-012373",
language = "English",
journal = "Medical Humanities",
issn = "1468-215X",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The transition from abortion to miscarriage to describe early pregnancy loss in British Medical Journals

T2 - a prescribed or natural lexical change?

AU - Malory, Beth

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in Medical Humanities following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at 10.1136/medhum-2021-012373

PY - 2022/3/30

Y1 - 2022/3/30

N2 - In British medical research, the transition from abortion to miscarriage, to describe early pregnancy loss, occurred in the late twentieth century. A 1985 letter to The Lancet by a group of eminent obstetricians was long considered unilaterally to have prompted this shift. More recently, however, this conclusion was challenged, and it was suggested instead that the transition constituted natural language change, as medical professionals responded to their changing social and professional milieu. This paper, however, uses a pioneering statistical modelling technique to demonstrate decisively that the 1985 Lancet letter was indeed pivotal in promoting miscarriage as an acceptable variant for use in medical journals. The abrupt nature of the vocabulary shift in question is made clear through the pioneering application of the statistical modelling technique change point analysis. This methodological innovation demonstrates clearly the decisive impact of the 1985 letter, while also showcasing the remarkable suitability of change point analysis to the study of such sudden linguistic changes. With an increasing emphasis on patient-centred models of care, it is likely that further prescriptive interventions relating to medical language will be made in coming years. Indeed, beyond the medical profession, there are already increasing calls for further reform to the language of pregnancy loss. To understand how such language reforms might successfully be enacted, and to ensure that linguistic prescriptivism is employed only where change is appropriate, proportionate, and evidence-based, it is necessary to understand fully this historical precedent. Against the backdrop of recent 'lay' demands for reforms, this paper affirms the decisive impact of the 1985 intervention, and considers the ramifications of this finding for the study of linguistic prescriptivism and future medical language reform.

AB - In British medical research, the transition from abortion to miscarriage, to describe early pregnancy loss, occurred in the late twentieth century. A 1985 letter to The Lancet by a group of eminent obstetricians was long considered unilaterally to have prompted this shift. More recently, however, this conclusion was challenged, and it was suggested instead that the transition constituted natural language change, as medical professionals responded to their changing social and professional milieu. This paper, however, uses a pioneering statistical modelling technique to demonstrate decisively that the 1985 Lancet letter was indeed pivotal in promoting miscarriage as an acceptable variant for use in medical journals. The abrupt nature of the vocabulary shift in question is made clear through the pioneering application of the statistical modelling technique change point analysis. This methodological innovation demonstrates clearly the decisive impact of the 1985 letter, while also showcasing the remarkable suitability of change point analysis to the study of such sudden linguistic changes. With an increasing emphasis on patient-centred models of care, it is likely that further prescriptive interventions relating to medical language will be made in coming years. Indeed, beyond the medical profession, there are already increasing calls for further reform to the language of pregnancy loss. To understand how such language reforms might successfully be enacted, and to ensure that linguistic prescriptivism is employed only where change is appropriate, proportionate, and evidence-based, it is necessary to understand fully this historical precedent. Against the backdrop of recent 'lay' demands for reforms, this paper affirms the decisive impact of the 1985 intervention, and considers the ramifications of this finding for the study of linguistic prescriptivism and future medical language reform.

KW - gynaecology

KW - medical humanities

KW - obstetrics

KW - linguistics

KW - pregnancy

U2 - 10.1136/medhum-2021-012373

DO - 10.1136/medhum-2021-012373

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35354578

JO - Medical Humanities

JF - Medical Humanities

SN - 1468-215X

ER -