Accepted author manuscript, 246 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - “This is a deepfake!”
T2 - Celebrity scandals, parodic deepfakes, and a critically speculative ethics of care for fandom research in the age of Artificial Intelligence
AU - Li, Eva Cheuk-Yin
AU - Pang, Ka-Wei
PY - 2025/1/5
Y1 - 2025/1/5
N2 - Fans are increasingly aware of deepfake—believable AI-fabricated videos—and are therefore more skeptical of unverified information, even when visual evidence appears convincing. This article offers a methodological reflection on analyzing a deepfake event in which fans produced and circulated AI-generated disinformation to playfully undermine the credibility of a celebrity’s video scandal. We explore the complex human-community-machine interactions (HCMI) between fans and AI-generated images, and we discuss how researchers can ethically (re)present their findings. We call for rethinking the “fan first” principle, a core tenet of ethical fandom research. Drawing on Puig de la Bellacasa’s technoscientific theorization of care, we propose a critically speculative ethics of care in fandom research, guided by three principles: (1) thinking with fans, (2) thinking for fandom, and (3) thinking beyond fans and fandom. This approach is particularly relevant in a digital media ecology where generative AI and fan practices mutually transform each other. Our discussion also serves as a springboard for further explorations of ethics related to AI, including its impact on trust, social relations, and power in fandom research.
AB - Fans are increasingly aware of deepfake—believable AI-fabricated videos—and are therefore more skeptical of unverified information, even when visual evidence appears convincing. This article offers a methodological reflection on analyzing a deepfake event in which fans produced and circulated AI-generated disinformation to playfully undermine the credibility of a celebrity’s video scandal. We explore the complex human-community-machine interactions (HCMI) between fans and AI-generated images, and we discuss how researchers can ethically (re)present their findings. We call for rethinking the “fan first” principle, a core tenet of ethical fandom research. Drawing on Puig de la Bellacasa’s technoscientific theorization of care, we propose a critically speculative ethics of care in fandom research, guided by three principles: (1) thinking with fans, (2) thinking for fandom, and (3) thinking beyond fans and fandom. This approach is particularly relevant in a digital media ecology where generative AI and fan practices mutually transform each other. Our discussion also serves as a springboard for further explorations of ethics related to AI, including its impact on trust, social relations, and power in fandom research.
KW - AI
KW - Counter-information
KW - Disinformation
KW - Ethics of Care
KW - Fans first
KW - Fan studies ethics
KW - Feminist ethics
KW - Human-Community-Machine Interactions (HCMI)
KW - Machine learning
KW - Parodic deepfake
M3 - Journal article
VL - 46
JO - Transformative Works and Cultures
JF - Transformative Works and Cultures
SN - 1941-2258
ER -