Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > "To mediate relevantly"
View graph of relations

"To mediate relevantly": a response to James Simpson

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

"To mediate relevantly": a response to James Simpson. / Waters, Alan.
In: Applied Linguistics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 602-608.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Waters A. "To mediate relevantly": a response to James Simpson. Applied Linguistics. 2009 Dec;30(4):602-608. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp057

Author

Waters, Alan. / "To mediate relevantly" : a response to James Simpson. In: Applied Linguistics. 2009 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 602-608.

Bibtex

@article{7edb884a92794e1b8e3ff6756f7e1c21,
title = "{"}To mediate relevantly{"}: a response to James Simpson",
abstract = "In Waters (2009), it was contended that, because of its ideological orientation, a good deal of applied linguistics for language teaching (ALLT) fails to {\textquoteleft}mediate relevantly{\textquoteright} between academic and practitioner perspectives. James Simpson{\textquoteright}s rejoinder to my article (Simpson 2009) attempts to refute its claims. However, in my view, it fails to do so, and, in the process, provides a further illustration of the problem. This occurs because a language teaching approach developed in one type of English Language Teaching (ELT) situation is presented as if of relevance to the field as a whole, and a number of its major limitations are not acknowledged. How this is the case is explained and the implications for ALLT in general are also considered.",
author = "Alan Waters",
year = "2009",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1093/applin/amp057",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "602--608",
journal = "Applied Linguistics",
issn = "1477-450X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "To mediate relevantly"

T2 - a response to James Simpson

AU - Waters, Alan

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - In Waters (2009), it was contended that, because of its ideological orientation, a good deal of applied linguistics for language teaching (ALLT) fails to ‘mediate relevantly’ between academic and practitioner perspectives. James Simpson’s rejoinder to my article (Simpson 2009) attempts to refute its claims. However, in my view, it fails to do so, and, in the process, provides a further illustration of the problem. This occurs because a language teaching approach developed in one type of English Language Teaching (ELT) situation is presented as if of relevance to the field as a whole, and a number of its major limitations are not acknowledged. How this is the case is explained and the implications for ALLT in general are also considered.

AB - In Waters (2009), it was contended that, because of its ideological orientation, a good deal of applied linguistics for language teaching (ALLT) fails to ‘mediate relevantly’ between academic and practitioner perspectives. James Simpson’s rejoinder to my article (Simpson 2009) attempts to refute its claims. However, in my view, it fails to do so, and, in the process, provides a further illustration of the problem. This occurs because a language teaching approach developed in one type of English Language Teaching (ELT) situation is presented as if of relevance to the field as a whole, and a number of its major limitations are not acknowledged. How this is the case is explained and the implications for ALLT in general are also considered.

U2 - 10.1093/applin/amp057

DO - 10.1093/applin/amp057

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 602

EP - 608

JO - Applied Linguistics

JF - Applied Linguistics

SN - 1477-450X

IS - 4

ER -