Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Towards a standardized protocol to assess natur...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks. / Carvalho, Fabio; Treasure, Lucy; Robinson, Samuel J. B. et al.
In: Ecological Solutions and Evidence, Vol. 4, No. 1, e12210, 31.03.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Carvalho F, Treasure L, Robinson SJB, Blaydes H, Exley G, Hayes R et al. Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks. Ecological Solutions and Evidence. 2023 Mar 31;4(1):e12210. Epub 2023 Feb 7. doi: 10.1002/2688-8319.12210

Author

Bibtex

@article{793d8877ef754046bc70b61167ed86d5,
title = "Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks",
abstract = "Natural capital and ecosystem services have emerged as fundamental concepts of ecosystem management strategies in the past two decades, particularly within major international land assessment frameworks, including the UN's Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services' Global Assessment Report. Despite the recent development of several analytical methods and models to quantify changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from land use change, incorporating them into the land planning process can be challenging from a practical point of view without guidance on standard methods. In an attempt to decarbonize energy supply systems to meet internationally agreed targets on climate change, solar energy production, in the form of ground‐mounted solar parks, is emerging as one of the dominant forms of temporary land use for renewable energies globally. We propose 19 directly measurable indicators associated with 16 ecosystem services within three major stocks of natural capital (biodiversity, soil and water) that are most likely to be impacted by the development of solar parks. Indicators are supported by well‐established methods that have been widely used in pure and applied land use research within terrestrial ecosystems. Moreover, they can be implemented flexibly according to interest or land management objectives. Whilst not intended as a precise recipe for how to assess the effects of solar park development on hosting ecosystems, the protocol will guide the solar energy industry and all actors involved, be they researchers, practitioners, ecological consultancies or statutory bodies, to implement a standardized approach to evaluate temporal and spatial changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from solar park development and operation, with the ultimate aim of generating comparable and reproducible data on ecosystem impact assessment across the solar energy sector.",
keywords = "Agroecology, Conservation ecology, Environmental sustainability, Landscape planning, Soil ecology, Spatial ecology, PERSPECTIVE, biodiversity, carbon cycle, land management, nutrient cycling, pollination, soil quality, solar energy, water quality",
author = "Fabio Carvalho and Lucy Treasure and Robinson, {Samuel J. B.} and Hollie Blaydes and Giles Exley and Rachel Hayes and Belinda Howell and Aidan Keith and Hannah Montag and Guy Parker and Sharp, {Stuart P.} and Cameron Witten and Alona Armstrong",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1002/2688-8319.12210",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Ecological Solutions and Evidence",
issn = "2688-8319",
publisher = "Wiley Open Access",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a standardized protocol to assess natural capital and ecosystem services in solar parks

AU - Carvalho, Fabio

AU - Treasure, Lucy

AU - Robinson, Samuel J. B.

AU - Blaydes, Hollie

AU - Exley, Giles

AU - Hayes, Rachel

AU - Howell, Belinda

AU - Keith, Aidan

AU - Montag, Hannah

AU - Parker, Guy

AU - Sharp, Stuart P.

AU - Witten, Cameron

AU - Armstrong, Alona

PY - 2023/3/31

Y1 - 2023/3/31

N2 - Natural capital and ecosystem services have emerged as fundamental concepts of ecosystem management strategies in the past two decades, particularly within major international land assessment frameworks, including the UN's Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services' Global Assessment Report. Despite the recent development of several analytical methods and models to quantify changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from land use change, incorporating them into the land planning process can be challenging from a practical point of view without guidance on standard methods. In an attempt to decarbonize energy supply systems to meet internationally agreed targets on climate change, solar energy production, in the form of ground‐mounted solar parks, is emerging as one of the dominant forms of temporary land use for renewable energies globally. We propose 19 directly measurable indicators associated with 16 ecosystem services within three major stocks of natural capital (biodiversity, soil and water) that are most likely to be impacted by the development of solar parks. Indicators are supported by well‐established methods that have been widely used in pure and applied land use research within terrestrial ecosystems. Moreover, they can be implemented flexibly according to interest or land management objectives. Whilst not intended as a precise recipe for how to assess the effects of solar park development on hosting ecosystems, the protocol will guide the solar energy industry and all actors involved, be they researchers, practitioners, ecological consultancies or statutory bodies, to implement a standardized approach to evaluate temporal and spatial changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from solar park development and operation, with the ultimate aim of generating comparable and reproducible data on ecosystem impact assessment across the solar energy sector.

AB - Natural capital and ecosystem services have emerged as fundamental concepts of ecosystem management strategies in the past two decades, particularly within major international land assessment frameworks, including the UN's Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services' Global Assessment Report. Despite the recent development of several analytical methods and models to quantify changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from land use change, incorporating them into the land planning process can be challenging from a practical point of view without guidance on standard methods. In an attempt to decarbonize energy supply systems to meet internationally agreed targets on climate change, solar energy production, in the form of ground‐mounted solar parks, is emerging as one of the dominant forms of temporary land use for renewable energies globally. We propose 19 directly measurable indicators associated with 16 ecosystem services within three major stocks of natural capital (biodiversity, soil and water) that are most likely to be impacted by the development of solar parks. Indicators are supported by well‐established methods that have been widely used in pure and applied land use research within terrestrial ecosystems. Moreover, they can be implemented flexibly according to interest or land management objectives. Whilst not intended as a precise recipe for how to assess the effects of solar park development on hosting ecosystems, the protocol will guide the solar energy industry and all actors involved, be they researchers, practitioners, ecological consultancies or statutory bodies, to implement a standardized approach to evaluate temporal and spatial changes in natural capital and ecosystem services resulting from solar park development and operation, with the ultimate aim of generating comparable and reproducible data on ecosystem impact assessment across the solar energy sector.

KW - Agroecology

KW - Conservation ecology

KW - Environmental sustainability

KW - Landscape planning

KW - Soil ecology

KW - Spatial ecology

KW - PERSPECTIVE

KW - biodiversity

KW - carbon cycle

KW - land management

KW - nutrient cycling

KW - pollination

KW - soil quality

KW - solar energy

KW - water quality

U2 - 10.1002/2688-8319.12210

DO - 10.1002/2688-8319.12210

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

JO - Ecological Solutions and Evidence

JF - Ecological Solutions and Evidence

SN - 2688-8319

IS - 1

M1 - e12210

ER -