Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Towards guidelines for time-trend reviews exami...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Towards guidelines for time-trend reviews examining temporal variability in human biomonitoring data of pollutants

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Towards guidelines for time-trend reviews examining temporal variability in human biomonitoring data of pollutants. / Sharma, B.M.; Kalina, J.; Whaley, P. et al.
In: Environment International, Vol. 151, 106437, 30.06.2021.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sharma BM, Kalina J, Whaley P, Scheringer M. Towards guidelines for time-trend reviews examining temporal variability in human biomonitoring data of pollutants. Environment International. 2021 Jun 30;151:106437. Epub 2021 Feb 21. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106437

Author

Bibtex

@article{a32a8bd9abc44aaaa110dfd87da65975,
title = "Towards guidelines for time-trend reviews examining temporal variability in human biomonitoring data of pollutants",
abstract = "In the last few decades, a plethora of studies have focused on human biomonitoring (HBM) of chemical pollutants. Reviewing the copious HBM data reported in these studies is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of pollution management efforts, for example by evaluating time-trends. Nevertheless, guidance to systematically evaluate time trends in published HBM data has never been developed. In this study, we therefore present a proposal for guidelines to conduct “time-trend reviews” (TTRs) that examine time trends in published large HBM datasets of chemical pollutant concentrations. We also demonstrate the applicability of these guidelines through a case study that assesses time-trends in global and regional HBM data on mercury. The recommended TTR guidelines in this study are divided into seven steps: formulating the objective of the TTR, setting up of eligibility criteria, defining search strategy and screening of literature, screening results of search, extracting data, analysing data, and assessing certainty, including the potential for bias in the evidence base. The TTR guidelines proposed in this study are straightforward and less complex than those for conducting systematic reviews assessing datasets on potential human health effects of exposure to pollutants or medical interventions. These proposed guidelines are intended to enable the credible, transparent, and reproducible conduct of TTRs. {\textcopyright} 2021 The Author(s)",
keywords = "Guidelines, Human biomonitoring, Pollutants, Research methods, Systematic reviews, Time trend reviews",
author = "B.M. Sharma and J. Kalina and P. Whaley and M. Scheringer",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.envint.2021.106437",
language = "English",
volume = "151",
journal = "Environment International",
issn = "0160-4120",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards guidelines for time-trend reviews examining temporal variability in human biomonitoring data of pollutants

AU - Sharma, B.M.

AU - Kalina, J.

AU - Whaley, P.

AU - Scheringer, M.

PY - 2021/6/30

Y1 - 2021/6/30

N2 - In the last few decades, a plethora of studies have focused on human biomonitoring (HBM) of chemical pollutants. Reviewing the copious HBM data reported in these studies is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of pollution management efforts, for example by evaluating time-trends. Nevertheless, guidance to systematically evaluate time trends in published HBM data has never been developed. In this study, we therefore present a proposal for guidelines to conduct “time-trend reviews” (TTRs) that examine time trends in published large HBM datasets of chemical pollutant concentrations. We also demonstrate the applicability of these guidelines through a case study that assesses time-trends in global and regional HBM data on mercury. The recommended TTR guidelines in this study are divided into seven steps: formulating the objective of the TTR, setting up of eligibility criteria, defining search strategy and screening of literature, screening results of search, extracting data, analysing data, and assessing certainty, including the potential for bias in the evidence base. The TTR guidelines proposed in this study are straightforward and less complex than those for conducting systematic reviews assessing datasets on potential human health effects of exposure to pollutants or medical interventions. These proposed guidelines are intended to enable the credible, transparent, and reproducible conduct of TTRs. © 2021 The Author(s)

AB - In the last few decades, a plethora of studies have focused on human biomonitoring (HBM) of chemical pollutants. Reviewing the copious HBM data reported in these studies is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of pollution management efforts, for example by evaluating time-trends. Nevertheless, guidance to systematically evaluate time trends in published HBM data has never been developed. In this study, we therefore present a proposal for guidelines to conduct “time-trend reviews” (TTRs) that examine time trends in published large HBM datasets of chemical pollutant concentrations. We also demonstrate the applicability of these guidelines through a case study that assesses time-trends in global and regional HBM data on mercury. The recommended TTR guidelines in this study are divided into seven steps: formulating the objective of the TTR, setting up of eligibility criteria, defining search strategy and screening of literature, screening results of search, extracting data, analysing data, and assessing certainty, including the potential for bias in the evidence base. The TTR guidelines proposed in this study are straightforward and less complex than those for conducting systematic reviews assessing datasets on potential human health effects of exposure to pollutants or medical interventions. These proposed guidelines are intended to enable the credible, transparent, and reproducible conduct of TTRs. © 2021 The Author(s)

KW - Guidelines

KW - Human biomonitoring

KW - Pollutants

KW - Research methods

KW - Systematic reviews

KW - Time trend reviews

U2 - 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106437

DO - 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106437

M3 - Journal article

VL - 151

JO - Environment International

JF - Environment International

SN - 0160-4120

M1 - 106437

ER -