Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Tropical biodiversity loss from land-use change is severely underestimated by local-scale assessments
AU - Socolar, Jacob B.
AU - Mills, Simon C.
AU - Gilroy, James J.
AU - Martínez-Revelo, Diego E.
AU - Medina-Uribe, Claudia A.
AU - Parra-Sanchez, Edicson
AU - Ramirez-Gutierrez, Marcela
AU - Sand Sæbø, Jørgen
AU - Meneses, Henry S.
AU - Pérez, Giovanny
AU - Barlow, Jos
AU - Ochoa Quintero, Jose M.
AU - Freckleton, Robert P.
AU - Haugaasen, Torbjørn
AU - Edwards, David P.
PY - 2025/7/22
Y1 - 2025/7/22
N2 - Human impacts on nature span vast spatial scales that transcend abiotic gradients and biogeographic barriers, yet estimates of biodiversity loss from land-use change overwhelmingly derive from local-scale studies. Using a field dataset of 971 bird species sampled in forest and cattle pasture across 13 biogeographic regions of Colombia, we quantify biodiversity losses from local to near-national scales. Losses are on average 60% worse at the pan-Colombian scale than in individual regions, with underestimation remaining until six to seven biogeographic regions are sampled. Regional losses greatly exceed local losses when beta-diversity is high due to reduced species turnover in pasture across geographic space and elevation. Extrapolation from local-scale studies causes major underestimation of biodiversity loss, emphasizing the need to incorporate spatial structure into measures of change.
AB - Human impacts on nature span vast spatial scales that transcend abiotic gradients and biogeographic barriers, yet estimates of biodiversity loss from land-use change overwhelmingly derive from local-scale studies. Using a field dataset of 971 bird species sampled in forest and cattle pasture across 13 biogeographic regions of Colombia, we quantify biodiversity losses from local to near-national scales. Losses are on average 60% worse at the pan-Colombian scale than in individual regions, with underestimation remaining until six to seven biogeographic regions are sampled. Regional losses greatly exceed local losses when beta-diversity is high due to reduced species turnover in pasture across geographic space and elevation. Extrapolation from local-scale studies causes major underestimation of biodiversity loss, emphasizing the need to incorporate spatial structure into measures of change.
U2 - 10.1038/s41559-025-02779-4
DO - 10.1038/s41559-025-02779-4
M3 - Journal article
JO - Nature Ecology and Evolution
JF - Nature Ecology and Evolution
SN - 2397-334X
ER -