Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Understanding of persons in community psycholog...
View graph of relations

Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism? / Bishop, Brian J.; Johnson, Karen; Browne, Alison L.
In: The Australian Community Psychologist, Vol. 18, No. 2, 08.2006, p. 20-30.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bishop, BJ, Johnson, K & Browne, AL 2006, 'Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism?', The Australian Community Psychologist, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 20-30. <http://www.groups.psychology.org.au/ccom/publications/#Volume18No2>

APA

Vancouver

Bishop BJ, Johnson K, Browne AL. Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism? The Australian Community Psychologist. 2006 Aug;18(2):20-30.

Author

Bishop, Brian J. ; Johnson, Karen ; Browne, Alison L. / Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism?. In: The Australian Community Psychologist. 2006 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 20-30.

Bibtex

@article{c0f8cd591b7b48f48fa4d299e0b8d90a,
title = "Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism?",
abstract = "Ecological analysis is fundamental to community psychology (Rappaport, 1977). An ecology epistemology implies that a systemic or contextual research approach should be prevalent; however reviews of community psychology research indicate that individualistic research and theory still dominate (Speer et al., 1992). We assert the need to increase contextualist research. To understand the nature of contextualist research, its underlying assumptions are discussed in the context of other research frameworks. We further argue that the dominance of positivism in community psychology is both inappropriate and misguided, and comes from a misunderstanding of the nature of people, and consequently, community. A deconstruction of personality theory is presented to allow a better understanding of people in context. Through this deconstruction, we argue for a grounded approach to research that operationalises contextualism.",
author = "Bishop, {Brian J.} and Karen Johnson and Browne, {Alison L.}",
year = "2006",
month = aug,
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "20--30",
journal = "The Australian Community Psychologist",
issn = "1320-7741",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding of persons in community psychology : a grounded holism?

AU - Bishop, Brian J.

AU - Johnson, Karen

AU - Browne, Alison L.

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Ecological analysis is fundamental to community psychology (Rappaport, 1977). An ecology epistemology implies that a systemic or contextual research approach should be prevalent; however reviews of community psychology research indicate that individualistic research and theory still dominate (Speer et al., 1992). We assert the need to increase contextualist research. To understand the nature of contextualist research, its underlying assumptions are discussed in the context of other research frameworks. We further argue that the dominance of positivism in community psychology is both inappropriate and misguided, and comes from a misunderstanding of the nature of people, and consequently, community. A deconstruction of personality theory is presented to allow a better understanding of people in context. Through this deconstruction, we argue for a grounded approach to research that operationalises contextualism.

AB - Ecological analysis is fundamental to community psychology (Rappaport, 1977). An ecology epistemology implies that a systemic or contextual research approach should be prevalent; however reviews of community psychology research indicate that individualistic research and theory still dominate (Speer et al., 1992). We assert the need to increase contextualist research. To understand the nature of contextualist research, its underlying assumptions are discussed in the context of other research frameworks. We further argue that the dominance of positivism in community psychology is both inappropriate and misguided, and comes from a misunderstanding of the nature of people, and consequently, community. A deconstruction of personality theory is presented to allow a better understanding of people in context. Through this deconstruction, we argue for a grounded approach to research that operationalises contextualism.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 20

EP - 30

JO - The Australian Community Psychologist

JF - The Australian Community Psychologist

SN - 1320-7741

IS - 2

ER -