Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Understanding the impact of covariates on the c...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control: a case study from Kenya

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control: a case study from Kenya. / Puranik, Amitha; Diggle, Peter J.; Odiere, Maurice R. et al.
In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 294, 29.11.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Puranik, A, Diggle, PJ, Odiere, MR, Gass, K, Kepha, S, Okoyo, C, Mwandawiro, C, Wakesho, F, Omondi, W, Sultani, HM & Giorgi, E 2024, 'Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control: a case study from Kenya', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 24, no. 1, 294. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02420-1

APA

Puranik, A., Diggle, P. J., Odiere, M. R., Gass, K., Kepha, S., Okoyo, C., Mwandawiro, C., Wakesho, F., Omondi, W., Sultani, H. M., & Giorgi, E. (2024). Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control: a case study from Kenya. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 24(1), Article 294. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02420-1

Vancouver

Puranik A, Diggle PJ, Odiere MR, Gass K, Kepha S, Okoyo C et al. Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control: a case study from Kenya. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02420-1

Author

Bibtex

@article{24f66c03fec040d687cce28c9e39b400,
title = "Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control: a case study from Kenya",
abstract = "Background: Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) are a parasitic infection that predominantly affects impoverished regions. Model-based geostatistics (MBG) has been established as a set of modern statistical methods that enable mapping of disease risk in a geographical area of interest. We investigate how the use of remotely sensed covariates can help to improve the predictive inferences on STH prevalence using MBG methods. In particular, we focus on how the covariates impact on the classification of areas into distinct class of STH prevalence. Methods: This study uses secondary data obtained from a sample of 1551 schools in Kenya, gathered through a combination of longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys. We compare the performance of two geostatistical models: one that does not make use of any spatially referenced covariate; and a second model that uses remotely sensed covariates to assist STH prevalence prediction. We also carry out a simulation study in which we compare the performance of the two models in the classifications of areal units with varying sample sizes and prevalence levels. Results: The model with covariates generated lower levels of uncertainty and was able to classify 88 more districts into prevalence classes than the model without covariates, which instead left those as “unclassified”. The simulation study showed that the model with covariates also yielded a higher proportion of correct classification of at least 40% for all sub-counties. Conclusion: Covariates can substantially reduce the uncertainty of the predictive inference generated from geostatistical models. Using covariates can thus contribute to the design of more effective STH control strategies by reducing sample sizes without compromising the predictive performance of geostatistical models.",
keywords = "Geostatistical methods, Kenya, Soil-transmitted helminthiasis, STH transmission classes, Spatially referenced covariates",
author = "Amitha Puranik and Diggle, {Peter J.} and Odiere, {Maurice R.} and Katherine Gass and Stella Kepha and Collins Okoyo and Charles Mwandawiro and Florence Wakesho and Wycliff Omondi and Sultani, {Hadley Matendechero} and Emanuele Giorgi",
year = "2024",
month = nov,
day = "29",
doi = "10.1186/s12874-024-02420-1",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the impact of covariates on the classification of implementation units for soil-transmitted helminths control

T2 - a case study from Kenya

AU - Puranik, Amitha

AU - Diggle, Peter J.

AU - Odiere, Maurice R.

AU - Gass, Katherine

AU - Kepha, Stella

AU - Okoyo, Collins

AU - Mwandawiro, Charles

AU - Wakesho, Florence

AU - Omondi, Wycliff

AU - Sultani, Hadley Matendechero

AU - Giorgi, Emanuele

PY - 2024/11/29

Y1 - 2024/11/29

N2 - Background: Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) are a parasitic infection that predominantly affects impoverished regions. Model-based geostatistics (MBG) has been established as a set of modern statistical methods that enable mapping of disease risk in a geographical area of interest. We investigate how the use of remotely sensed covariates can help to improve the predictive inferences on STH prevalence using MBG methods. In particular, we focus on how the covariates impact on the classification of areas into distinct class of STH prevalence. Methods: This study uses secondary data obtained from a sample of 1551 schools in Kenya, gathered through a combination of longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys. We compare the performance of two geostatistical models: one that does not make use of any spatially referenced covariate; and a second model that uses remotely sensed covariates to assist STH prevalence prediction. We also carry out a simulation study in which we compare the performance of the two models in the classifications of areal units with varying sample sizes and prevalence levels. Results: The model with covariates generated lower levels of uncertainty and was able to classify 88 more districts into prevalence classes than the model without covariates, which instead left those as “unclassified”. The simulation study showed that the model with covariates also yielded a higher proportion of correct classification of at least 40% for all sub-counties. Conclusion: Covariates can substantially reduce the uncertainty of the predictive inference generated from geostatistical models. Using covariates can thus contribute to the design of more effective STH control strategies by reducing sample sizes without compromising the predictive performance of geostatistical models.

AB - Background: Soil-transmitted helminthiasis (STH) are a parasitic infection that predominantly affects impoverished regions. Model-based geostatistics (MBG) has been established as a set of modern statistical methods that enable mapping of disease risk in a geographical area of interest. We investigate how the use of remotely sensed covariates can help to improve the predictive inferences on STH prevalence using MBG methods. In particular, we focus on how the covariates impact on the classification of areas into distinct class of STH prevalence. Methods: This study uses secondary data obtained from a sample of 1551 schools in Kenya, gathered through a combination of longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys. We compare the performance of two geostatistical models: one that does not make use of any spatially referenced covariate; and a second model that uses remotely sensed covariates to assist STH prevalence prediction. We also carry out a simulation study in which we compare the performance of the two models in the classifications of areal units with varying sample sizes and prevalence levels. Results: The model with covariates generated lower levels of uncertainty and was able to classify 88 more districts into prevalence classes than the model without covariates, which instead left those as “unclassified”. The simulation study showed that the model with covariates also yielded a higher proportion of correct classification of at least 40% for all sub-counties. Conclusion: Covariates can substantially reduce the uncertainty of the predictive inference generated from geostatistical models. Using covariates can thus contribute to the design of more effective STH control strategies by reducing sample sizes without compromising the predictive performance of geostatistical models.

KW - Geostatistical methods

KW - Kenya

KW - Soil-transmitted helminthiasis

KW - STH transmission classes

KW - Spatially referenced covariates

U2 - 10.1186/s12874-024-02420-1

DO - 10.1186/s12874-024-02420-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 1

M1 - 294

ER -