Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Unlocking “lock-in” and path dependency : A review across disciplines and socio-environmental contexts. / Goldstein, J.E.; Neimark, B.; Garvey, B. et al.
In: World Development, Vol. 161, 106116, 31.01.2023.Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Unlocking “lock-in” and path dependency
T2 - A review across disciplines and socio-environmental contexts
AU - Goldstein, J.E.
AU - Neimark, B.
AU - Garvey, B.
AU - Phelps, J.
N1 - Export Date: 27 October 2022
PY - 2023/1/31
Y1 - 2023/1/31
N2 - Introduced in the early 2000s, the concept of carbon “lock-in” has been widely adopted by think tanks, academics, and civil society trying to break away from the consequences of fossil-fuel induced carbon emissions and climate change. The concept has been instrumental to energy economic policy, energy transitions, and automobile transportation and urban mobility. It has parallels with “path dependency” across sectors, including water governance, fisheries, farmer tenure, and debt. Yet its use has also fallen short in applying it to nontechnical settings beyond infrastructure. In this review article, we argue that the “lock-in” concept is relevant to a much broader range of multi-scalar socio-environmental challenges to development. We expand lock-in to consider granular issues that tend to slip out of macro-level technological and institutional path dependencies, without falling into the ‘naturalizing trap’ in systems thinking. Broadening and re-engaging the concept of lock-in strengthens our analytical ability to address a range of structurally uneven environmental and societal lock-ins. © 2022 The Author(s)
AB - Introduced in the early 2000s, the concept of carbon “lock-in” has been widely adopted by think tanks, academics, and civil society trying to break away from the consequences of fossil-fuel induced carbon emissions and climate change. The concept has been instrumental to energy economic policy, energy transitions, and automobile transportation and urban mobility. It has parallels with “path dependency” across sectors, including water governance, fisheries, farmer tenure, and debt. Yet its use has also fallen short in applying it to nontechnical settings beyond infrastructure. In this review article, we argue that the “lock-in” concept is relevant to a much broader range of multi-scalar socio-environmental challenges to development. We expand lock-in to consider granular issues that tend to slip out of macro-level technological and institutional path dependencies, without falling into the ‘naturalizing trap’ in systems thinking. Broadening and re-engaging the concept of lock-in strengthens our analytical ability to address a range of structurally uneven environmental and societal lock-ins. © 2022 The Author(s)
KW - Climate change
KW - Energy
KW - Lock-in
KW - Maladaptation
KW - Path dependency
KW - Poverty trap
U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106116
DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106116
M3 - Journal article
VL - 161
JO - World Development
JF - World Development
SN - 0305-750X
M1 - 106116
ER -