Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Variation in appropriate diabetes care and trea...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: An observational study of the 'rule of halves'

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: An observational study of the 'rule of halves'. / Mason, T.; Whittaker, W.; Dumville, J.C. et al.
In: BMJ Open, Vol. 12, No. 2, e057244, 16.02.2022.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Mason T, Whittaker W, Dumville JC, Bower P. Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: An observational study of the 'rule of halves'. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):e057244. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057244

Author

Bibtex

@article{6798328ca80d4a12acb01d18221604e1,
title = "Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England: An observational study of the 'rule of halves'",
abstract = "Objectives To estimate the {\textquoteleft}rule of halves{\textquoteright} for diabetes care for urban and rural areas in England using several data sources covering the period 2015–2017; and to examine the extent to which any differences in urban and rural settings are explained by population characteristics and the workforce supply of primary care providers (general practices).Design A retrospective observational study.Setting Populations resident in predominantly urban and rural areas in England (2015–2017).Participants N=33 336 respondents to the UK Household Longitudinal Survey in urban and rural settings in England; N=4913 general practices in England reporting to the National Diabetes Audit and providing workforce data to NHS Digital.Outcomes Diabetes prevalence; administrative records of diagnoses of diabetes; provision of (all eight) recommended diabetes care processes; diabetes treatment targets.Results Diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas in England (7.80% (95% CI 7.30% to 8.31%)) relative to rural areas (7.24% (95% CI 6.32% to 8.16%)). For practices in urban areas, relatively fewer cases of diabetes were recorded in administrative medical records (69.55% vs 71.86%), and a smaller percentage of those registered received the appropriate care (45.85% vs 49.32%). Among estimated prevalent cases of diabetes, urban areas have a 24.84% achieving these targets compared with 25.16% in rural areas. However, adjusted analyses showed that the performance of practices in urban areas in providing appropriate care quality was not significantly different from practices in rural areas.Conclusions The {\textquoteleft}rule of halves{\textquoteright} is not an accurate description of the actual pattern across the diabetes care pathway in England. More than half of the estimated urban and rural diabetes population are registered with clinical practices and have access to treatment. However, less than half of those registered for treatment have achieved treatment targets. Appropriate care quality was associated with a greater proportion of patients with diabetes achieving treatment targets.",
author = "T. Mason and W. Whittaker and J.C. Dumville and P. Bower",
year = "2022",
month = feb,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057244",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in appropriate diabetes care and treatment targets in urban and rural areas in England

T2 - An observational study of the 'rule of halves'

AU - Mason, T.

AU - Whittaker, W.

AU - Dumville, J.C.

AU - Bower, P.

PY - 2022/2/16

Y1 - 2022/2/16

N2 - Objectives To estimate the ‘rule of halves’ for diabetes care for urban and rural areas in England using several data sources covering the period 2015–2017; and to examine the extent to which any differences in urban and rural settings are explained by population characteristics and the workforce supply of primary care providers (general practices).Design A retrospective observational study.Setting Populations resident in predominantly urban and rural areas in England (2015–2017).Participants N=33 336 respondents to the UK Household Longitudinal Survey in urban and rural settings in England; N=4913 general practices in England reporting to the National Diabetes Audit and providing workforce data to NHS Digital.Outcomes Diabetes prevalence; administrative records of diagnoses of diabetes; provision of (all eight) recommended diabetes care processes; diabetes treatment targets.Results Diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas in England (7.80% (95% CI 7.30% to 8.31%)) relative to rural areas (7.24% (95% CI 6.32% to 8.16%)). For practices in urban areas, relatively fewer cases of diabetes were recorded in administrative medical records (69.55% vs 71.86%), and a smaller percentage of those registered received the appropriate care (45.85% vs 49.32%). Among estimated prevalent cases of diabetes, urban areas have a 24.84% achieving these targets compared with 25.16% in rural areas. However, adjusted analyses showed that the performance of practices in urban areas in providing appropriate care quality was not significantly different from practices in rural areas.Conclusions The ‘rule of halves’ is not an accurate description of the actual pattern across the diabetes care pathway in England. More than half of the estimated urban and rural diabetes population are registered with clinical practices and have access to treatment. However, less than half of those registered for treatment have achieved treatment targets. Appropriate care quality was associated with a greater proportion of patients with diabetes achieving treatment targets.

AB - Objectives To estimate the ‘rule of halves’ for diabetes care for urban and rural areas in England using several data sources covering the period 2015–2017; and to examine the extent to which any differences in urban and rural settings are explained by population characteristics and the workforce supply of primary care providers (general practices).Design A retrospective observational study.Setting Populations resident in predominantly urban and rural areas in England (2015–2017).Participants N=33 336 respondents to the UK Household Longitudinal Survey in urban and rural settings in England; N=4913 general practices in England reporting to the National Diabetes Audit and providing workforce data to NHS Digital.Outcomes Diabetes prevalence; administrative records of diagnoses of diabetes; provision of (all eight) recommended diabetes care processes; diabetes treatment targets.Results Diabetes prevalence was higher in urban areas in England (7.80% (95% CI 7.30% to 8.31%)) relative to rural areas (7.24% (95% CI 6.32% to 8.16%)). For practices in urban areas, relatively fewer cases of diabetes were recorded in administrative medical records (69.55% vs 71.86%), and a smaller percentage of those registered received the appropriate care (45.85% vs 49.32%). Among estimated prevalent cases of diabetes, urban areas have a 24.84% achieving these targets compared with 25.16% in rural areas. However, adjusted analyses showed that the performance of practices in urban areas in providing appropriate care quality was not significantly different from practices in rural areas.Conclusions The ‘rule of halves’ is not an accurate description of the actual pattern across the diabetes care pathway in England. More than half of the estimated urban and rural diabetes population are registered with clinical practices and have access to treatment. However, less than half of those registered for treatment have achieved treatment targets. Appropriate care quality was associated with a greater proportion of patients with diabetes achieving treatment targets.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057244

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057244

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 2

M1 - e057244

ER -