Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Water level identification with laser sensors, ...

Electronic data

  • manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 2.87 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Water level identification with laser sensors, inertial units, and machine learning

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
Article number107235
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/01/2024
<mark>Journal</mark>Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Issue numberPart A
Volume127
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date11/10/23
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Flood risk management usually hinges on accurate water level identification in urban streams such as rivers or creeks. Although research has emphasised the applicability of ultrasonic sensors as a contactless technology for sensor-based water level monitoring, Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensors are less sensitive to weather conditions that typically happen during flood events, such as dust, fog and rainfall. However, there has been little research on the applicability of LiDAR sensors in this field. No previous literature has analysed the impact of complicating variables on the quality of predictions or evaluated the possible benefits of using a combined approach with Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) and machine learning to produce superior predictions. In this work, we collected a dataset in a laboratory condition synchronising data from a LiDAR, an ultrasonic sensor and an IMU in an experimental device. We controlled the incidence angle, the distance, and the water turbidity to analyse their effect on the predictions. Traditional machine-learning techniques were evaluated as models to combine data from distance and inertial sensors, reducing the error rates compared to individual sensors’ predictions. Results indicated a sharp drop in the mean absolute error, root mean squared error and coefficient of determination for all water turbidity and incidence angles considered, especially when tree-based ensembles were used. The ultrasonic sensor led to improved results for low water turbidity and increased incidence angle, but statistically significant differences were not found in the other cases.