Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change. / Friedel, Marina; Chiodo, Gabriel; Sukhodolov, Timofei et al.
In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 23, No. 17, 14.09.2023, p. 10235-10254.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Friedel, M, Chiodo, G, Sukhodolov, T, Keeble, J, Peter, T, Seeber, S, Stenke, A, Akiyoshi, H, Rozanov, E, Plummer, D, Jöckel, P, Zeng, G, Morgenstern, O & Josse, B 2023, 'Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change', Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 10235-10254. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023

APA

Friedel, M., Chiodo, G., Sukhodolov, T., Keeble, J., Peter, T., Seeber, S., Stenke, A., Akiyoshi, H., Rozanov, E., Plummer, D., Jöckel, P., Zeng, G., Morgenstern, O., & Josse, B. (2023). Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23(17), 10235-10254. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023

Vancouver

Friedel M, Chiodo G, Sukhodolov T, Keeble J, Peter T, Seeber S et al. Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2023 Sept 14;23(17):10235-10254. doi: 10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023

Author

Friedel, Marina ; Chiodo, Gabriel ; Sukhodolov, Timofei et al. / Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change. In: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. 2023 ; Vol. 23, No. 17. pp. 10235-10254.

Bibtex

@article{dae6491466e44615a5a5dedebc2d51e2,
title = "Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change",
abstract = "In the Arctic stratosphere, the combination of chemical ozone depletion by halogenated ozone-depleting substances (hODSs) and dynamic fluctuations can lead to severe ozone minima. These Arctic ozone minima are of great societal concern due to their health and climate impacts. Owing to the success of the Montreal Protocol, hODSs in the stratosphere are gradually declining, resulting in a recovery of the ozone layer. On the other hand, continued greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cool the stratosphere, possibly enhancing the formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and, thus, enabling more efficient chemical ozone destruction. Other processes, such as the acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, also affect stratospheric temperatures, further complicating the picture. Therefore, it is currently unclear whether major Arctic ozone minima will still occur at the end of the 21st century despite decreasing hODSs. We have examined this question for different emission pathways using simulations conducted within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022) and found large differences in the models' ability to simulate the magnitude of ozone minima in the present-day climate. Models with a generally too-cold polar stratosphere (cold bias) produce pronounced ozone minima under present-day climate conditions because they simulate more PSCs and, thus, high concentrations of active chlorine species (ClOx). These models predict the largest decrease in ozone minima in the future. Conversely, models with a warm polar stratosphere (warm bias) have the smallest sensitivity of ozone minima to future changes in hODS and GHG concentrations. As a result, the scatter among models in terms of the magnitude of Arctic spring ozone minima will decrease in the future. Overall, these results suggest that Arctic ozone minima will become weaker over the next decades, largely due to the decline in hODS abundances. We note that none of the models analysed here project a notable increase of ozone minima in the future. Stratospheric cooling caused by increasing GHG concentrations is expected to play a secondary role as its effect in the Arctic stratosphere is weakened by opposing radiative and dynamical mechanisms.",
author = "Marina Friedel and Gabriel Chiodo and Timofei Sukhodolov and James Keeble and Thomas Peter and Svenja Seeber and Andrea Stenke and Hideharu Akiyoshi and Eugene Rozanov and David Plummer and Patrick J{\"o}ckel and Guang Zeng and Olaf Morgenstern and B{\'e}atrice Josse",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Copyright: ",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "14",
doi = "10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "10235--10254",
journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics",
issn = "1680-7316",
publisher = "Copernicus GmbH (Copernicus Publications) on behalf of the European Geosciences Union (EGU)",
number = "17",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weakening of springtime Arctic ozone depletion with climate change

AU - Friedel, Marina

AU - Chiodo, Gabriel

AU - Sukhodolov, Timofei

AU - Keeble, James

AU - Peter, Thomas

AU - Seeber, Svenja

AU - Stenke, Andrea

AU - Akiyoshi, Hideharu

AU - Rozanov, Eugene

AU - Plummer, David

AU - Jöckel, Patrick

AU - Zeng, Guang

AU - Morgenstern, Olaf

AU - Josse, Béatrice

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright:

PY - 2023/9/14

Y1 - 2023/9/14

N2 - In the Arctic stratosphere, the combination of chemical ozone depletion by halogenated ozone-depleting substances (hODSs) and dynamic fluctuations can lead to severe ozone minima. These Arctic ozone minima are of great societal concern due to their health and climate impacts. Owing to the success of the Montreal Protocol, hODSs in the stratosphere are gradually declining, resulting in a recovery of the ozone layer. On the other hand, continued greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cool the stratosphere, possibly enhancing the formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and, thus, enabling more efficient chemical ozone destruction. Other processes, such as the acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, also affect stratospheric temperatures, further complicating the picture. Therefore, it is currently unclear whether major Arctic ozone minima will still occur at the end of the 21st century despite decreasing hODSs. We have examined this question for different emission pathways using simulations conducted within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022) and found large differences in the models' ability to simulate the magnitude of ozone minima in the present-day climate. Models with a generally too-cold polar stratosphere (cold bias) produce pronounced ozone minima under present-day climate conditions because they simulate more PSCs and, thus, high concentrations of active chlorine species (ClOx). These models predict the largest decrease in ozone minima in the future. Conversely, models with a warm polar stratosphere (warm bias) have the smallest sensitivity of ozone minima to future changes in hODS and GHG concentrations. As a result, the scatter among models in terms of the magnitude of Arctic spring ozone minima will decrease in the future. Overall, these results suggest that Arctic ozone minima will become weaker over the next decades, largely due to the decline in hODS abundances. We note that none of the models analysed here project a notable increase of ozone minima in the future. Stratospheric cooling caused by increasing GHG concentrations is expected to play a secondary role as its effect in the Arctic stratosphere is weakened by opposing radiative and dynamical mechanisms.

AB - In the Arctic stratosphere, the combination of chemical ozone depletion by halogenated ozone-depleting substances (hODSs) and dynamic fluctuations can lead to severe ozone minima. These Arctic ozone minima are of great societal concern due to their health and climate impacts. Owing to the success of the Montreal Protocol, hODSs in the stratosphere are gradually declining, resulting in a recovery of the ozone layer. On the other hand, continued greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cool the stratosphere, possibly enhancing the formation of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) and, thus, enabling more efficient chemical ozone destruction. Other processes, such as the acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson circulation, also affect stratospheric temperatures, further complicating the picture. Therefore, it is currently unclear whether major Arctic ozone minima will still occur at the end of the 21st century despite decreasing hODSs. We have examined this question for different emission pathways using simulations conducted within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI-1 and CCMI-2022) and found large differences in the models' ability to simulate the magnitude of ozone minima in the present-day climate. Models with a generally too-cold polar stratosphere (cold bias) produce pronounced ozone minima under present-day climate conditions because they simulate more PSCs and, thus, high concentrations of active chlorine species (ClOx). These models predict the largest decrease in ozone minima in the future. Conversely, models with a warm polar stratosphere (warm bias) have the smallest sensitivity of ozone minima to future changes in hODS and GHG concentrations. As a result, the scatter among models in terms of the magnitude of Arctic spring ozone minima will decrease in the future. Overall, these results suggest that Arctic ozone minima will become weaker over the next decades, largely due to the decline in hODS abundances. We note that none of the models analysed here project a notable increase of ozone minima in the future. Stratospheric cooling caused by increasing GHG concentrations is expected to play a secondary role as its effect in the Arctic stratosphere is weakened by opposing radiative and dynamical mechanisms.

U2 - 10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023

DO - 10.5194/acp-23-10235-2023

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85173287352

VL - 23

SP - 10235

EP - 10254

JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

SN - 1680-7316

IS - 17

ER -