Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Prog...

Electronic data

  • Huanget2025ijchm

    Accepted author manuscript, 915 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes?: Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes? Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness. / Huang, Jingxi; Daryanto, Ahmad; Hogg, Margaret et al.
In: International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 37, No. 13, 31.12.2025, p. 1-54.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Huang, J, Daryanto, A, Hogg, M & Chan, J 2025, 'What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes? Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness', International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-03-2024-0414

APA

Huang, J., Daryanto, A., Hogg, M., & Chan, J. (2025). What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes? Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 37(13), 1-54. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-03-2024-0414

Vancouver

Huang J, Daryanto A, Hogg M, Chan J. What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes? Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2025 Dec 31;37(13):1-54. Epub 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1108/ijchm-03-2024-0414

Author

Huang, Jingxi ; Daryanto, Ahmad ; Hogg, Margaret et al. / What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes? Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness. In: International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2025 ; Vol. 37, No. 13. pp. 1-54.

Bibtex

@article{980c2a84d51b4a9f80a8926ef57ad3e6,
title = "What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes?: Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness",
abstract = "AbstractPurpose – This study addresses the challenge of encouraging customers to join hotels{\textquoteright} green loyalty programmes (LPs) by examining the impact on customers{\textquoteright} decisions of their trait reactance, anticipated guilt, and the physical attractiveness of service employees.Design – We conducted three preliminary studies and one main study using scenario-based online surveys targeting Chinese hotel customers. The first two preliminary studies (N1A = 100,N1B = 158) explored the negative emotions (guilt vs. shame) linked to non-participation in green LPs, while the third study (N1C = 110) examined gender{\textquoteright}s role in perceived physical attractiveness. The main study (N = 836) tested the three-way interaction effect.Findings – This analysis confirms that guilt, rather than shame, plays a significant role in the decision-making process for participating in green LPs. The results reveal that trait reactance strongly deters participation intention when customers anticipate low guilt and perceive service employees as less attractive. Notably, higher anticipated guilt renders trait reactance ineffective in influencing intentions, regardless of employees{\textquoteright} attractiveness.Research implications: Our results reveal that a high level of anticipated guilt is the key to boosting customers{\textquoteright} intention to participate in a hotel{\textquoteright}s green LP, which can mitigate the negative impact of customers{\textquoteright} trait reactance.Originality – This is the first study to demonstrate how anticipated guilt can lessen the negative effects of customers{\textquoteright} trait reactance on their intention to participate in green LPs. Additionally, our findings reveal that guilt not only narrows customers{\textquoteright} attentional focus but also influences how the attractiveness of service employees affects their decision-making processes. Our work introduces a new angle on how emotional responses (anticipated guilt) interact with physical cues (employee attractiveness) in shaping customer decisions concerning the hotel{\textquoteright}s greeninitiatives.Keywords: Customer reactance; Anticipated guilt; Physical attractiveness; Attentionnarrowing; Green loyalty programmes",
author = "Jingxi Huang and Ahmad Daryanto and Margaret Hogg and Jin Chan",
year = "2025",
month = feb,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1108/ijchm-03-2024-0414",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "1--54",
journal = "International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management",
issn = "0959-6119",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "13",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Drives Participation in Green Loyalty Programmes?

T2 - Examining Reactance, Guilt, and Staff Attractiveness

AU - Huang, Jingxi

AU - Daryanto, Ahmad

AU - Hogg, Margaret

AU - Chan, Jin

PY - 2025/2/27

Y1 - 2025/2/27

N2 - AbstractPurpose – This study addresses the challenge of encouraging customers to join hotels’ green loyalty programmes (LPs) by examining the impact on customers’ decisions of their trait reactance, anticipated guilt, and the physical attractiveness of service employees.Design – We conducted three preliminary studies and one main study using scenario-based online surveys targeting Chinese hotel customers. The first two preliminary studies (N1A = 100,N1B = 158) explored the negative emotions (guilt vs. shame) linked to non-participation in green LPs, while the third study (N1C = 110) examined gender’s role in perceived physical attractiveness. The main study (N = 836) tested the three-way interaction effect.Findings – This analysis confirms that guilt, rather than shame, plays a significant role in the decision-making process for participating in green LPs. The results reveal that trait reactance strongly deters participation intention when customers anticipate low guilt and perceive service employees as less attractive. Notably, higher anticipated guilt renders trait reactance ineffective in influencing intentions, regardless of employees’ attractiveness.Research implications: Our results reveal that a high level of anticipated guilt is the key to boosting customers’ intention to participate in a hotel’s green LP, which can mitigate the negative impact of customers’ trait reactance.Originality – This is the first study to demonstrate how anticipated guilt can lessen the negative effects of customers’ trait reactance on their intention to participate in green LPs. Additionally, our findings reveal that guilt not only narrows customers’ attentional focus but also influences how the attractiveness of service employees affects their decision-making processes. Our work introduces a new angle on how emotional responses (anticipated guilt) interact with physical cues (employee attractiveness) in shaping customer decisions concerning the hotel’s greeninitiatives.Keywords: Customer reactance; Anticipated guilt; Physical attractiveness; Attentionnarrowing; Green loyalty programmes

AB - AbstractPurpose – This study addresses the challenge of encouraging customers to join hotels’ green loyalty programmes (LPs) by examining the impact on customers’ decisions of their trait reactance, anticipated guilt, and the physical attractiveness of service employees.Design – We conducted three preliminary studies and one main study using scenario-based online surveys targeting Chinese hotel customers. The first two preliminary studies (N1A = 100,N1B = 158) explored the negative emotions (guilt vs. shame) linked to non-participation in green LPs, while the third study (N1C = 110) examined gender’s role in perceived physical attractiveness. The main study (N = 836) tested the three-way interaction effect.Findings – This analysis confirms that guilt, rather than shame, plays a significant role in the decision-making process for participating in green LPs. The results reveal that trait reactance strongly deters participation intention when customers anticipate low guilt and perceive service employees as less attractive. Notably, higher anticipated guilt renders trait reactance ineffective in influencing intentions, regardless of employees’ attractiveness.Research implications: Our results reveal that a high level of anticipated guilt is the key to boosting customers’ intention to participate in a hotel’s green LP, which can mitigate the negative impact of customers’ trait reactance.Originality – This is the first study to demonstrate how anticipated guilt can lessen the negative effects of customers’ trait reactance on their intention to participate in green LPs. Additionally, our findings reveal that guilt not only narrows customers’ attentional focus but also influences how the attractiveness of service employees affects their decision-making processes. Our work introduces a new angle on how emotional responses (anticipated guilt) interact with physical cues (employee attractiveness) in shaping customer decisions concerning the hotel’s greeninitiatives.Keywords: Customer reactance; Anticipated guilt; Physical attractiveness; Attentionnarrowing; Green loyalty programmes

U2 - 10.1108/ijchm-03-2024-0414

DO - 10.1108/ijchm-03-2024-0414

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 1

EP - 54

JO - International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

JF - International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management

SN - 0959-6119

IS - 13

ER -