Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What features are considered important for elec...

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What features are considered important for electronic safety-netting tools to UK general practice staff?: An interview and Delphi consensus study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
  • Claire Friedemann Smith
  • Sue Duncombe
  • Susannah Fleming
  • Yasemin Hirst
  • Georgia Black
  • Clare Bankhead
  • Brian Nicholson
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>5/06/2023
<mark>Journal</mark>BJGP Open
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date5/06/23
<mark>Original language</mark>English


BACKGROUND: The potential of the electronic health record to support safety-netting has been recognised and a number of electronic safety-netting (E-SN) tools developed.

AIM: To establish the most important features of E-SN tools.

DESIGN & SETTING: User experience interviews carried out with primary care staff who had trialled the EMIS E-SN toolkit for suspected cancer, and a Delphi study with primary care staff involved in safety-netting in any capacity.

METHOD: The user experience interviews were carried out remotely. An electronic modified Delphi approach was used to measure consensus on tool features.

RESULTS: Thirteen user experience interviews were carried out and features of E-SN tools seen as important formed the majority of the features included in the Delphi study. Three rounds of Delphi survey were administered. Sixteen (64%) respondents completed all three rounds, and 28 out of 44 (64%) features reached consensus. Primary care staff also preferred tools that are general in scope.

CONCLUSION: Primary care staff indicated that tools which were not specific to cancer or any other disease and had features that promoted their flexible, efficient, and integrated use were important. However, when the important features were discussed with our PPI group they expressed disappointment that features they believed would make E-SN tools robust and provide a safety-net that is difficult to fall through did not reach consensus. The successful adoption of E-SN tools will rely on an evidence base of their effectiveness. Efforts should be made to assess the impact of these tools on patient outcomes.