Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > What is quality in assisted living technology?

Electronic data

  • art%3A10.1186%2Fs12916-015-0279-6

    Rights statement: © Greenhalgh et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

    Final published version, 928 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

What is quality in assisted living technology?: the ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

What is quality in assisted living technology? the ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. / Greenhalgh, Trish; Procter, Rob; Wherton, Joe; Sugarhood, Paul; Rouncefield, Mark Francis.

In: BMC Medicine, Vol. 13, 91, 23.04.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Greenhalgh, Trish ; Procter, Rob ; Wherton, Joe ; Sugarhood, Paul ; Rouncefield, Mark Francis. / What is quality in assisted living technology? the ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. In: BMC Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 13.

Bibtex

@article{764a7e1fbdfa4a99ae0c13f603a7c760,
title = "What is quality in assisted living technology?: the ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services",
abstract = "BackgroundWe sought to define quality in telehealth and telecare with the aim of improving the proportion of patients who receive appropriate, acceptable and workable technologies and services to support them living with illness or disability.MethodsThis was a three-phase study: (1) interviews with seven technology suppliers and 14 service providers, (2) ethnographic case studies of 40 people, 60 to 98 years old, with multi-morbidity and assisted living needs and (3) 10 co-design workshops. In phase 1, we explored barriers to uptake of telehealth and telecare. In phase 2, we used ethnographic methods to build a detailed picture of participants{\textquoteright} lives, illness experiences and technology use. In phase 3, we brought users and their carers together with suppliers and providers to derive quality principles for assistive technology products and services.ResultsInterviews identified practical, material and organisational barriers to smooth introduction and continued support of assistive technologies. The experience of multi-morbidity was characterised by multiple, mutually reinforcing and inexorably worsening impairments, producing diverse and unique care challenges. Participants and their carers managed these pragmatically, obtaining technologies and adapting the home. Installed technologies were rarely fit for purpose. Support services for technologies made high (and sometimes oppressive) demands on users. Six principles emerged from the workshops. Quality telehealth or telecare is 1) ANCHORED in a shared understanding of what matters to the user; 2) REALISTIC about the natural history of illness; 3) CO-CREATIVE, evolving and adapting solutions with users; 4) HUMAN, supported through interpersonal relationships and social networks; 5) INTEGRATED, through attention to mutual awareness and knowledge sharing; 6) EVALUATED to drive system learning.ConclusionsTechnological advances are important, but must be underpinned by industry and service providers following a user-centred approach to design and delivery. For the ARCHIE principles to be realised, the sector requires: (1) a shift in focus from product ({\textquoteleft}assistive technologies{\textquoteright}) to performance ({\textquoteleft}supporting technologies-in-use{\textquoteright}); (2) a shift in the commissioning model from standardised to personalised home care contracts; and (3) a shift in the design model from {\textquoteleft}walled garden{\textquoteright}, branded products to inter-operable components that can be combined and used flexibly across devices and platforms.",
author = "Trish Greenhalgh and Rob Procter and Joe Wherton and Paul Sugarhood and Rouncefield, {Mark Francis}",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "BMC Medicine",
issn = "1741-7015",
publisher = "BIOMED CENTRAL LTD",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is quality in assisted living technology?

T2 - the ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services

AU - Greenhalgh, Trish

AU - Procter, Rob

AU - Wherton, Joe

AU - Sugarhood, Paul

AU - Rouncefield, Mark Francis

PY - 2015/4/23

Y1 - 2015/4/23

N2 - BackgroundWe sought to define quality in telehealth and telecare with the aim of improving the proportion of patients who receive appropriate, acceptable and workable technologies and services to support them living with illness or disability.MethodsThis was a three-phase study: (1) interviews with seven technology suppliers and 14 service providers, (2) ethnographic case studies of 40 people, 60 to 98 years old, with multi-morbidity and assisted living needs and (3) 10 co-design workshops. In phase 1, we explored barriers to uptake of telehealth and telecare. In phase 2, we used ethnographic methods to build a detailed picture of participants’ lives, illness experiences and technology use. In phase 3, we brought users and their carers together with suppliers and providers to derive quality principles for assistive technology products and services.ResultsInterviews identified practical, material and organisational barriers to smooth introduction and continued support of assistive technologies. The experience of multi-morbidity was characterised by multiple, mutually reinforcing and inexorably worsening impairments, producing diverse and unique care challenges. Participants and their carers managed these pragmatically, obtaining technologies and adapting the home. Installed technologies were rarely fit for purpose. Support services for technologies made high (and sometimes oppressive) demands on users. Six principles emerged from the workshops. Quality telehealth or telecare is 1) ANCHORED in a shared understanding of what matters to the user; 2) REALISTIC about the natural history of illness; 3) CO-CREATIVE, evolving and adapting solutions with users; 4) HUMAN, supported through interpersonal relationships and social networks; 5) INTEGRATED, through attention to mutual awareness and knowledge sharing; 6) EVALUATED to drive system learning.ConclusionsTechnological advances are important, but must be underpinned by industry and service providers following a user-centred approach to design and delivery. For the ARCHIE principles to be realised, the sector requires: (1) a shift in focus from product (‘assistive technologies’) to performance (‘supporting technologies-in-use’); (2) a shift in the commissioning model from standardised to personalised home care contracts; and (3) a shift in the design model from ‘walled garden’, branded products to inter-operable components that can be combined and used flexibly across devices and platforms.

AB - BackgroundWe sought to define quality in telehealth and telecare with the aim of improving the proportion of patients who receive appropriate, acceptable and workable technologies and services to support them living with illness or disability.MethodsThis was a three-phase study: (1) interviews with seven technology suppliers and 14 service providers, (2) ethnographic case studies of 40 people, 60 to 98 years old, with multi-morbidity and assisted living needs and (3) 10 co-design workshops. In phase 1, we explored barriers to uptake of telehealth and telecare. In phase 2, we used ethnographic methods to build a detailed picture of participants’ lives, illness experiences and technology use. In phase 3, we brought users and their carers together with suppliers and providers to derive quality principles for assistive technology products and services.ResultsInterviews identified practical, material and organisational barriers to smooth introduction and continued support of assistive technologies. The experience of multi-morbidity was characterised by multiple, mutually reinforcing and inexorably worsening impairments, producing diverse and unique care challenges. Participants and their carers managed these pragmatically, obtaining technologies and adapting the home. Installed technologies were rarely fit for purpose. Support services for technologies made high (and sometimes oppressive) demands on users. Six principles emerged from the workshops. Quality telehealth or telecare is 1) ANCHORED in a shared understanding of what matters to the user; 2) REALISTIC about the natural history of illness; 3) CO-CREATIVE, evolving and adapting solutions with users; 4) HUMAN, supported through interpersonal relationships and social networks; 5) INTEGRATED, through attention to mutual awareness and knowledge sharing; 6) EVALUATED to drive system learning.ConclusionsTechnological advances are important, but must be underpinned by industry and service providers following a user-centred approach to design and delivery. For the ARCHIE principles to be realised, the sector requires: (1) a shift in focus from product (‘assistive technologies’) to performance (‘supporting technologies-in-use’); (2) a shift in the commissioning model from standardised to personalised home care contracts; and (3) a shift in the design model from ‘walled garden’, branded products to inter-operable components that can be combined and used flexibly across devices and platforms.

U2 - 10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6

DO - 10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

JO - BMC Medicine

JF - BMC Medicine

SN - 1741-7015

M1 - 91

ER -