Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?
View graph of relations

When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders? / Francis, Brian; Soothill, Keith.
In: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2009, p. 373-387.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Francis, B & Soothill, K 2009, 'When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?', The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00576.x

APA

Vancouver

Francis B, Soothill K. When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders? The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 2009;48(4):373-387. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00576.x

Author

Francis, Brian ; Soothill, Keith. / When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?. In: The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 2009 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 373-387.

Bibtex

@article{a85862ace9a9476cb4453bf33b9e9beb,
title = "When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?",
abstract = "When can ex-offenders with no further convictions be considered as exhibiting the same risk of reconviction as non-offenders? This issue is relevant for the retention and disclosure of early criminal records, and is a controversial issue. Replicating American work by Kurlychek and his colleagues (2006, 2007), this study focusing on England and Wales broadly endorses their findings by suggesting that groups whose members have either a finding of guilt as a juvenile or a conviction between the ages of 17 and 20 years – but no further convictions – converge with the non-offending group at around the age of 30 years, while the group whose members have findings of guilt as a juvenile and convictions as a young adult prior to 21 years eventually converges with the other groups at around the age of 35 years. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.",
keywords = "criminal recods, intermittency, recidivism, desistance, redemption, risk, prediction",
author = "Brian Francis and Keith Soothill",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00576.x",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "373--387",
journal = "The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0265-5527",
publisher = "Basil Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - When do ex-offenders become like non-offenders?

AU - Francis, Brian

AU - Soothill, Keith

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - When can ex-offenders with no further convictions be considered as exhibiting the same risk of reconviction as non-offenders? This issue is relevant for the retention and disclosure of early criminal records, and is a controversial issue. Replicating American work by Kurlychek and his colleagues (2006, 2007), this study focusing on England and Wales broadly endorses their findings by suggesting that groups whose members have either a finding of guilt as a juvenile or a conviction between the ages of 17 and 20 years – but no further convictions – converge with the non-offending group at around the age of 30 years, while the group whose members have findings of guilt as a juvenile and convictions as a young adult prior to 21 years eventually converges with the other groups at around the age of 35 years. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.

AB - When can ex-offenders with no further convictions be considered as exhibiting the same risk of reconviction as non-offenders? This issue is relevant for the retention and disclosure of early criminal records, and is a controversial issue. Replicating American work by Kurlychek and his colleagues (2006, 2007), this study focusing on England and Wales broadly endorses their findings by suggesting that groups whose members have either a finding of guilt as a juvenile or a conviction between the ages of 17 and 20 years – but no further convictions – converge with the non-offending group at around the age of 30 years, while the group whose members have findings of guilt as a juvenile and convictions as a young adult prior to 21 years eventually converges with the other groups at around the age of 35 years. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are considered.

KW - criminal recods

KW - intermittency

KW - recidivism

KW - desistance

KW - redemption

KW - risk

KW - prediction

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00576.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00576.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 373

EP - 387

JO - The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0265-5527

IS - 4

ER -