Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy?: a consensus statement

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy? a consensus statement. / Boulton, Andrew; TS, Jensen; Luecke, T et al.
In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, Vol. 206, No. Suppl. 1, 110763, 01.12.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Boulton, A, TS, J, Luecke, T, Petersen, E, Pop-Busui, R, RS, T, Tesfaye, S, Vileikyte, L & Ziegler, D 2023, 'Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy? a consensus statement', Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 206, no. Suppl. 1, 110763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110763

APA

Boulton, A., TS, J., Luecke, T., Petersen, E., Pop-Busui, R., RS, T., Tesfaye, S., Vileikyte, L., & Ziegler, D. (2023). Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy? a consensus statement. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 206(Suppl. 1), Article 110763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110763

Vancouver

Boulton A, TS J, Luecke T, Petersen E, Pop-Busui R, RS T et al. Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy? a consensus statement. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2023 Dec 1;206(Suppl. 1):110763. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110763

Author

Boulton, Andrew ; TS, Jensen ; Luecke, T et al. / Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy? a consensus statement. In: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2023 ; Vol. 206, No. Suppl. 1.

Bibtex

@article{3c358da4f298445d8eb15b5862071d48,
title = "Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy?: a consensus statement",
abstract = "BackgroundAlthough pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants and/or antidepressants can be effective for many people with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), albeit with frequent side-effects, a critical juncture occurs when neuropathic pain no longer responds to standard first- and second-step mono- and dual therapy and becomes refractory. Subsequent to these pharmacotherapeutic approaches, third-line treatment options for PDN may include opioids (short-term), capsaicin 8% patches, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS).AimThis document summarizes consensus recommendations regarding appropriate treatment for refractory peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PDN), based on outcomes from an expert panel convened on December 10, 2022, as part of the Worldwide Initiative for Diabetes Education Virtual Global Summit, {"}Advances in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.{"}ParticipantsNine attendees, eminent physicians and academics, comprising six diabetes specialists, two pain specialists, and one health services expert.EvidenceFor individuals with refractory PDN, opioids are a high-risk option that do not provide a long-term solution and should not be used. For appropriately selected individuals, SCS is an effective, safe, and durable treatment option. In particular, high-frequency (HF) SCS (10 kHz) shows strong efficacy and improves quality of life. To ensure treatment success, strict screening criteria should be used to prioritize candidates for SCS.Consensus processEach participant voiced their opinion after reviewing available data, and a verbal consensus was reached during the meeting.ConclusionGlobally, the use of opioids should rarely be recommended for refractory, severe PDN. Based on increasing clinical evidence, SCS, especially HF-SCS, should be considered as a treatment for PDN that is not responsive to first- or second-line monotherapy/dual therapy.",
author = "Andrew Boulton and Jensen TS and T Luecke and Erika Petersen and R Pop-Busui and Taylor RS and Solomon Tesfaye and L Vileikyte and D Ziegler",
year = "2023",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110763",
language = "English",
volume = "206",
journal = "Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice",
issn = "0168-8227",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "Suppl. 1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Where does spinal cord stimulation fit into the international guidelines for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy?

T2 - a consensus statement

AU - Boulton, Andrew

AU - TS, Jensen

AU - Luecke, T

AU - Petersen, Erika

AU - Pop-Busui, R

AU - RS, Taylor

AU - Tesfaye, Solomon

AU - Vileikyte, L

AU - Ziegler, D

PY - 2023/12/1

Y1 - 2023/12/1

N2 - BackgroundAlthough pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants and/or antidepressants can be effective for many people with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), albeit with frequent side-effects, a critical juncture occurs when neuropathic pain no longer responds to standard first- and second-step mono- and dual therapy and becomes refractory. Subsequent to these pharmacotherapeutic approaches, third-line treatment options for PDN may include opioids (short-term), capsaicin 8% patches, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS).AimThis document summarizes consensus recommendations regarding appropriate treatment for refractory peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PDN), based on outcomes from an expert panel convened on December 10, 2022, as part of the Worldwide Initiative for Diabetes Education Virtual Global Summit, "Advances in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy."ParticipantsNine attendees, eminent physicians and academics, comprising six diabetes specialists, two pain specialists, and one health services expert.EvidenceFor individuals with refractory PDN, opioids are a high-risk option that do not provide a long-term solution and should not be used. For appropriately selected individuals, SCS is an effective, safe, and durable treatment option. In particular, high-frequency (HF) SCS (10 kHz) shows strong efficacy and improves quality of life. To ensure treatment success, strict screening criteria should be used to prioritize candidates for SCS.Consensus processEach participant voiced their opinion after reviewing available data, and a verbal consensus was reached during the meeting.ConclusionGlobally, the use of opioids should rarely be recommended for refractory, severe PDN. Based on increasing clinical evidence, SCS, especially HF-SCS, should be considered as a treatment for PDN that is not responsive to first- or second-line monotherapy/dual therapy.

AB - BackgroundAlthough pharmacotherapy with anticonvulsants and/or antidepressants can be effective for many people with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), albeit with frequent side-effects, a critical juncture occurs when neuropathic pain no longer responds to standard first- and second-step mono- and dual therapy and becomes refractory. Subsequent to these pharmacotherapeutic approaches, third-line treatment options for PDN may include opioids (short-term), capsaicin 8% patches, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS).AimThis document summarizes consensus recommendations regarding appropriate treatment for refractory peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PDN), based on outcomes from an expert panel convened on December 10, 2022, as part of the Worldwide Initiative for Diabetes Education Virtual Global Summit, "Advances in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy."ParticipantsNine attendees, eminent physicians and academics, comprising six diabetes specialists, two pain specialists, and one health services expert.EvidenceFor individuals with refractory PDN, opioids are a high-risk option that do not provide a long-term solution and should not be used. For appropriately selected individuals, SCS is an effective, safe, and durable treatment option. In particular, high-frequency (HF) SCS (10 kHz) shows strong efficacy and improves quality of life. To ensure treatment success, strict screening criteria should be used to prioritize candidates for SCS.Consensus processEach participant voiced their opinion after reviewing available data, and a verbal consensus was reached during the meeting.ConclusionGlobally, the use of opioids should rarely be recommended for refractory, severe PDN. Based on increasing clinical evidence, SCS, especially HF-SCS, should be considered as a treatment for PDN that is not responsive to first- or second-line monotherapy/dual therapy.

U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110763

DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110763

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38245326

VL - 206

JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

SN - 0168-8227

IS - Suppl. 1

M1 - 110763

ER -