Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Works in Progress
View graph of relations

Works in Progress: New Technologies and the European Court of Human Rights

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Works in Progress : New Technologies and the European Court of Human Rights. / Murphy, Thérèse; O Cuinn, Gearoid.

In: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, 12.2010, p. 601-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Murphy, Thérèse ; O Cuinn, Gearoid. / Works in Progress : New Technologies and the European Court of Human Rights. In: Human Rights Law Review. 2010 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 601-638.

Bibtex

@article{a9f9a8df28004e6e912d030b4b598848,
title = "Works in Progress: New Technologies and the European Court of Human Rights",
abstract = "A field—new technologies and human rights or, more broadly, law and technology—is in the process of being framed. Should the European Court of Human Rights be seen as part of that process? To find out, we searched the Court's case law using HUDOC, a database on the Council of Europe website which contains both judgments and admissibility decisions. We entered 155 keywords, all in English, and in this article we report and analyse what we found. The overall conclusion is twofold: first, it is too early to attempt a complete characterisation of the Court's position on new technologies; and second, the Court is however {\textquoteleft}one to watch{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "technology, human rights",
author = "Th{\'e}r{\`e}se Murphy and {O Cuinn}, Gearoid",
year = "2010",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1093/hrlr/ngq038",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "601--638",
journal = "Human Rights Law Review",
issn = "1461-7781",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Works in Progress

T2 - New Technologies and the European Court of Human Rights

AU - Murphy, Thérèse

AU - O Cuinn, Gearoid

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - A field—new technologies and human rights or, more broadly, law and technology—is in the process of being framed. Should the European Court of Human Rights be seen as part of that process? To find out, we searched the Court's case law using HUDOC, a database on the Council of Europe website which contains both judgments and admissibility decisions. We entered 155 keywords, all in English, and in this article we report and analyse what we found. The overall conclusion is twofold: first, it is too early to attempt a complete characterisation of the Court's position on new technologies; and second, the Court is however ‘one to watch’.

AB - A field—new technologies and human rights or, more broadly, law and technology—is in the process of being framed. Should the European Court of Human Rights be seen as part of that process? To find out, we searched the Court's case law using HUDOC, a database on the Council of Europe website which contains both judgments and admissibility decisions. We entered 155 keywords, all in English, and in this article we report and analyse what we found. The overall conclusion is twofold: first, it is too early to attempt a complete characterisation of the Court's position on new technologies; and second, the Court is however ‘one to watch’.

KW - technology

KW - human rights

U2 - 10.1093/hrlr/ngq038

DO - 10.1093/hrlr/ngq038

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 601

EP - 638

JO - Human Rights Law Review

JF - Human Rights Law Review

SN - 1461-7781

IS - 4

ER -