Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Pushing the limits of design fiction

Electronic data

  • Pushing_DF_to_the_limit_rebuttal_edits_version_6_1_16

    Rights statement: © ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in CHI '16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858446

    Accepted author manuscript, 9 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Pushing the limits of design fiction: the case for fictional research papers

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paper

Published
Publication date5/05/2016
Host publicationCHI '16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherACM
Pages4032-4043
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9781450333627
Original languageEnglish
EventCHI 2016 - California, San Jose, United States
Duration: 7/05/201612/05/2016

Conference

ConferenceCHI 2016
CountryUnited States
CitySan Jose
Period7/05/1612/05/16

Conference

ConferenceCHI 2016
CountryUnited States
CitySan Jose
Period7/05/1612/05/16

Abstract

This paper considers how design fictions in the form of ‘imaginary abstracts’ can be extended into complete ‘fictional papers’. Imaginary abstracts are a type of design fiction that are usually included within the content of ‘real’ research papers, they comprise brief accounts of fictional problem frames, prototypes, user studies and findings. Design fiction abstracts have been proposed as a means to move beyond solutionism to explore the potential societal value and consequences of new HCI concepts. In this paper we contrast the properties of imaginary abstracts, with the properties of a published paper that presents fictional research, Game of Drones. Extending the notion of imaginary abstracts so that rather than including fictional abstracts within a ‘non-fiction’ research paper, Game of Drones is fiction from start to finish (except for the concluding paragraph where the fictional nature of the paper is revealed). In this paper we review the scope of design fiction in HCI research before contrasting the properties of imaginary abstracts with the properties of our example fictional research paper. We argue that there are clear merits and weaknesses to both approaches, but when used tactfully and carefully fictional research papers may further empower HCI’s burgeoning design discourse with compelling new methods.

Bibliographic note

© ACM, 2016. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive Version of Record was published in CHI '16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858446