Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > A comparison of Bayesian information borrowing ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

A comparison of Bayesian information borrowing methods in basket trials and a novel proposal of modified exchangeability‐nonexchangeability method

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

A comparison of Bayesian information borrowing methods in basket trials and a novel proposal of modified exchangeability‐nonexchangeability method. / Daniells, Libby; Mozgunov, Pavel; Bedding, Alun et al.
In: Statistics in Medicine, 23.08.2023.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{910b0649de5142cb9bfb45300f658991,
title = "A comparison of Bayesian information borrowing methods in basket trials and a novel proposal of modified exchangeability‐nonexchangeability method",
abstract = "Recent innovation in trial design to improve study efficiency has led to the development of basket trials in which a single therapeutic treatment is tested on several patient populations, each of which forms a basket. In a common setting, patients across all baskets share a genetic marker and as such, an assumption can be made that all patients may have a homogeneous response to treatments. Bayesian information borrowing procedures utilize this assumption to draw on information regarding the response in one basket when estimating the response rate in others. This can improve power and precision of estimates particularly in the presence of small sample sizes, however, can come at a cost of biased estimates and an inflation of error rates, bringing into question validity of trial conclusions. We review and compare the performance of several Bayesian borrowing methods, namely: the Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model (CBHM), exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model and a Bayesian model averaging procedure. A generalization of the CBHM is made to account for unequal sample sizes across baskets. We also propose a modification of the EXNEX model that allows for better control of a type I error. The proposed method uses a data-driven approach to account for the homogeneity of the response data, measured through Hellinger distances. Through an extensive simulation study motivated by a real basket trial, for both equal and unequal sample sizes across baskets, we show that in the presence of a basket with a heterogeneous response, unlike the other methods discussed, this model can control type I error rates to a nominal level whilst yielding improved power. [Abstract copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.]",
keywords = "basket trial, Bayesian hierarchical model, error control, master protocol, information borrowing",
author = "Libby Daniells and Pavel Mozgunov and Alun Bedding and Thomas Jaki",
year = "2023",
month = aug,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1002/sim.9867",
language = "English",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of Bayesian information borrowing methods in basket trials and a novel proposal of modified exchangeability‐nonexchangeability method

AU - Daniells, Libby

AU - Mozgunov, Pavel

AU - Bedding, Alun

AU - Jaki, Thomas

PY - 2023/8/23

Y1 - 2023/8/23

N2 - Recent innovation in trial design to improve study efficiency has led to the development of basket trials in which a single therapeutic treatment is tested on several patient populations, each of which forms a basket. In a common setting, patients across all baskets share a genetic marker and as such, an assumption can be made that all patients may have a homogeneous response to treatments. Bayesian information borrowing procedures utilize this assumption to draw on information regarding the response in one basket when estimating the response rate in others. This can improve power and precision of estimates particularly in the presence of small sample sizes, however, can come at a cost of biased estimates and an inflation of error rates, bringing into question validity of trial conclusions. We review and compare the performance of several Bayesian borrowing methods, namely: the Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model (CBHM), exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model and a Bayesian model averaging procedure. A generalization of the CBHM is made to account for unequal sample sizes across baskets. We also propose a modification of the EXNEX model that allows for better control of a type I error. The proposed method uses a data-driven approach to account for the homogeneity of the response data, measured through Hellinger distances. Through an extensive simulation study motivated by a real basket trial, for both equal and unequal sample sizes across baskets, we show that in the presence of a basket with a heterogeneous response, unlike the other methods discussed, this model can control type I error rates to a nominal level whilst yielding improved power. [Abstract copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.]

AB - Recent innovation in trial design to improve study efficiency has led to the development of basket trials in which a single therapeutic treatment is tested on several patient populations, each of which forms a basket. In a common setting, patients across all baskets share a genetic marker and as such, an assumption can be made that all patients may have a homogeneous response to treatments. Bayesian information borrowing procedures utilize this assumption to draw on information regarding the response in one basket when estimating the response rate in others. This can improve power and precision of estimates particularly in the presence of small sample sizes, however, can come at a cost of biased estimates and an inflation of error rates, bringing into question validity of trial conclusions. We review and compare the performance of several Bayesian borrowing methods, namely: the Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM), calibrated Bayesian hierarchical model (CBHM), exchangeability-nonexchangeability (EXNEX) model and a Bayesian model averaging procedure. A generalization of the CBHM is made to account for unequal sample sizes across baskets. We also propose a modification of the EXNEX model that allows for better control of a type I error. The proposed method uses a data-driven approach to account for the homogeneity of the response data, measured through Hellinger distances. Through an extensive simulation study motivated by a real basket trial, for both equal and unequal sample sizes across baskets, we show that in the presence of a basket with a heterogeneous response, unlike the other methods discussed, this model can control type I error rates to a nominal level whilst yielding improved power. [Abstract copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.]

KW - basket trial

KW - Bayesian hierarchical model

KW - error control

KW - master protocol

KW - information borrowing

U2 - 10.1002/sim.9867

DO - 10.1002/sim.9867

M3 - Journal article

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

ER -