Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Associations of Nutritional and Social Exposure...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Associations of Nutritional and Social Exposures in Utero, Early, and Later Childhood with Cognitive, Motor, and Social-Emotional Development in Indonesia (OR10-03-19)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineMeeting abstractpeer-review

Published
  • Elizabeth Prado
  • Susy K Sebayang
  • Siti R. Adawiyah
  • Benyamin Harefa
  • Katie Alcock
  • Michael T. Ullman
  • Husni Muadz
  • Anuraj H. Shankar
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>13/06/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Current Developments in Nutrition
Issue numberSupplement 1
Volume3
Number of pages1
Pages (from-to)735
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association of biomedical and socioenvironmental risk factors during pregnancy, early, and later childhood
with cognitive (IQ), motor, social-emotional (SE), and executive
function (EF) at age 3.5 and 9–12 y in Indonesia.
Methods: Children born to pregnant women enrolled in the Supplementation with Multiple Micronutrients Intervention Trial (SUMMIT)
in 2001–2004 participated in follow-up studies at age 3.5 y in 2006
and 9–12 y in 2013. We assessed 359 children at both time points
for outcomes of IQ, motor, SE and EF. We also assessed predictors
of outcomes including biomedical risks (small for gestational age at
birth: SGA; height-for-age z-score: HAZ; and child hemoglobin: Hb)
and socio-environmental risks (HOME Inventory; maternal depression:
MD). We calculated the residuals of earlier risks predicting the later
scores, e.g., the residual of SGA at birth predicting HAZ at 3.5 y
(rHAZ1), representing the deviation of HAZ at 3.5 y from the child’s
expected HAZ based on SGA. In Model 1, we entered SGA, representing
in utero exposures. In Model 2, we added indicators at 3.5 y (rHAZ1, Hb,
HOME, MD). In Model 3, we added indicators at 9–12 y (rHAZ2, rHb,
rHOME, rMD) and the corresponding 3.5 y IQ, motor, SE, or EF scores.
Results: The coefficients for outcomes at early and later time points
(Figure 1) show that SGA was not associated with any scores. Early
(3.5 y) childhood rHAZ1 was associated with early IQ, motor, and EF,
but was not independently associated with later (9–12 y) IQ, motor,
or EF. Later childhood rHAZ2 was not associated with any scores.
Early childhood HOME was independently associated with both early
and later IQ, motor, and EF, while later childhood rHOME was not
associated with any scores. Early Hb was not associated with any scores
and later rHb was associated with motor scores only. MD during
early childhood and rMD during later childhood were independently
associated with later childhood SE.
Conclusions: These findings support the importance of early and
continual intervention throughout childhood to support healthy growth
and even more importantly maternal mental health and nurturing home
environments. This is essential for longer-term IQ, motor, SE, and EF.