Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Bonding and bridging social capital in family f...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Bonding and bridging social capital in family firm internationalization

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Bonding and bridging social capital in family firm internationalization. / Rondi, Emanuela; Debellis, Francesco; De Massis, Alfredo et al.
In: Sinergie, Vol. 38, No. 2, 31.08.2020, p. 113-131.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Rondi E, Debellis F, De Massis A, Garzoni A. Bonding and bridging social capital in family firm internationalization. Sinergie. 2020 Aug 31;38(2):113-131. doi: 10.7433/s112.2020.06

Author

Rondi, Emanuela ; Debellis, Francesco ; De Massis, Alfredo et al. / Bonding and bridging social capital in family firm internationalization. In: Sinergie. 2020 ; Vol. 38, No. 2. pp. 113-131.

Bibtex

@article{594d4e1362c84aab8c978797ab3666f1,
title = "Bonding and bridging social capital in family firm internationalization",
abstract = "Purpose of the paper: This paper aims to study how family firms manage their Global Value Chain (GVC). In particular, we investigate how family firms are able to keep control over operations outsourced to foreign partners. Prior research focused on understanding how firms control their GVC has mainly concentrated on large multinational enterprises. However, while large multinational enterprises can overcome transaction cost complexities by exploiting their superior legitimacy and power control over weaker firms, family SMEs often do not have that amount of power due to financial and managerial constrains. In this study, we thus conceptually examine a unique characteristic that can help family SMEs to overcome resource limits and gain control over the GVC: their distinctive social capital.Methodology: ConceptualFindings: Family SMEs can exploit their superior social capital in order to build long-term relationships based on trust with foreign partners, thereby being able to control their GVC without legally owning it.Research limits: The study is conceptual, future research should test the model and empirically examine the theorized mechanisms. Social capital is only grasped according to its positive side and in relation to cohesion, future research should examine the negative side of social capital and the role of conflict in our model. Finally, family firm heterogeneity is currently neglected.Practical implications: Our study offers insightful managerial suggestions to family firm executives and their foreign partners in terms of design and governance of their GVC.Originality of the paper: Our study offers theoretical and managerial contributions to the current understanding of family firm internationalization beyond exports.",
author = "Emanuela Rondi and Francesco Debellis and {De Massis}, Alfredo and A Garzoni",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "31",
doi = "10.7433/s112.2020.06",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "113--131",
journal = "Sinergie",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bonding and bridging social capital in family firm internationalization

AU - Rondi, Emanuela

AU - Debellis, Francesco

AU - De Massis, Alfredo

AU - Garzoni, A

PY - 2020/8/31

Y1 - 2020/8/31

N2 - Purpose of the paper: This paper aims to study how family firms manage their Global Value Chain (GVC). In particular, we investigate how family firms are able to keep control over operations outsourced to foreign partners. Prior research focused on understanding how firms control their GVC has mainly concentrated on large multinational enterprises. However, while large multinational enterprises can overcome transaction cost complexities by exploiting their superior legitimacy and power control over weaker firms, family SMEs often do not have that amount of power due to financial and managerial constrains. In this study, we thus conceptually examine a unique characteristic that can help family SMEs to overcome resource limits and gain control over the GVC: their distinctive social capital.Methodology: ConceptualFindings: Family SMEs can exploit their superior social capital in order to build long-term relationships based on trust with foreign partners, thereby being able to control their GVC without legally owning it.Research limits: The study is conceptual, future research should test the model and empirically examine the theorized mechanisms. Social capital is only grasped according to its positive side and in relation to cohesion, future research should examine the negative side of social capital and the role of conflict in our model. Finally, family firm heterogeneity is currently neglected.Practical implications: Our study offers insightful managerial suggestions to family firm executives and their foreign partners in terms of design and governance of their GVC.Originality of the paper: Our study offers theoretical and managerial contributions to the current understanding of family firm internationalization beyond exports.

AB - Purpose of the paper: This paper aims to study how family firms manage their Global Value Chain (GVC). In particular, we investigate how family firms are able to keep control over operations outsourced to foreign partners. Prior research focused on understanding how firms control their GVC has mainly concentrated on large multinational enterprises. However, while large multinational enterprises can overcome transaction cost complexities by exploiting their superior legitimacy and power control over weaker firms, family SMEs often do not have that amount of power due to financial and managerial constrains. In this study, we thus conceptually examine a unique characteristic that can help family SMEs to overcome resource limits and gain control over the GVC: their distinctive social capital.Methodology: ConceptualFindings: Family SMEs can exploit their superior social capital in order to build long-term relationships based on trust with foreign partners, thereby being able to control their GVC without legally owning it.Research limits: The study is conceptual, future research should test the model and empirically examine the theorized mechanisms. Social capital is only grasped according to its positive side and in relation to cohesion, future research should examine the negative side of social capital and the role of conflict in our model. Finally, family firm heterogeneity is currently neglected.Practical implications: Our study offers insightful managerial suggestions to family firm executives and their foreign partners in terms of design and governance of their GVC.Originality of the paper: Our study offers theoretical and managerial contributions to the current understanding of family firm internationalization beyond exports.

U2 - 10.7433/s112.2020.06

DO - 10.7433/s112.2020.06

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 113

EP - 131

JO - Sinergie

JF - Sinergie

IS - 2

ER -